Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 31;39(5):855–862. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03807-5

Table 1.

Study participant characteristics and complement marker results

SB LNB Difference
Variable p value
N 60 22
Age, years
Median (range) 51 (20–68) 66 (18–82) < 0.001
Sex
Female 12 (20) 11 (50)
Male 48 (80) 11 (50) 0.012
Seropositive for anti-Borrelia IgG antibodiesa
No 0 (0.0) 15 (68.2)
Yes 60 (100.0) 7 (31.8)
C3, g/L
Median (range) 1.02 (0.65–2.98) 1.05 (0.72–1.54) 0.743
C3a/C3 ratio × 1000 (ACA1)
Median (range) 5.2 (0.3–25.6) 2.2 (0.5–11.6) < 0.001
C3a/C3 ratio × 1000 (Lu59)
Median (range) 9.2 (3.3–39.5) 7.4 (3.8–29.5) 0.157
sC5b-9 (ACA1), mg/L
Median (range) 8.8 (0.5–31.2) 6.4 (0.8–17.8) 0.118
sC5b-9 (Lu59), mg/L
Median (range) 25.1 (7.3–55.9) 26.3 (10.7–49.0) 0.870

aSeropositive for anti-Borrelia antibodies according to the manufacturer’s (Mikrogen GmbH, Neuried, Germany) scoring system at the time of inclusion in this study. N, number of cases; SB, subclinical individuals; LNB, Lyme neuroborreliosis