Table 1.

Inferential statistics for Experiment 1

	Pre-trigger	Trigger	Post-trigger	Final word	Total
Trigger type	F(1,47) = 82.37, p < .001, η2p = .64	F(1,47) = 628.80, p < .001, η2p = .93	F(1,47) = 472.96, p < .001, η2p = .91	F(1,47) = 39.87, p < .001, η2p = .46	F(1,47) = 6.69, p = .013, η2p = .12
Sentence type	F(2,94) = 0.86, p = .426, η2p = .02	F(2,94) = 544.50, p < .001, η2p = .92, ε = .73	F(2,94) = 25.23, p < .001, η2p = .35, ε = .60	F(2,94) = 0.73, p = .439, η2p = .02, ε = .69	F(2,94) = 3.01, p = .073, η2p = .06, ε = .71
Interaction	F(2,94) = 2.99, p = .055, η2p = .06	F(2,94) = 409.19, p < .001, η2p = .90, ε = .88	F(2,94) = 10.67, p < .001, η2p = .19, ε = .87	F(2,94) = 1.11, p = .334, η2p = .02	F(2,94) = 22.54, p < .001, η2p = .32, ε = .87
Only determiner
Sentence type		F(2,94) = 466.72, p < .001, η2p = .91, ε = .86	F(2,94) = 8.30, p = .003, η2p = .15, ε = .63		F(2,94) = 0.58, p = .530, η2p = .01, ε = .83
Trigger versus neutral		t(47) = 25.10, p < .001, d = 3.62	t(47) = 3.46, p = .001, d = 0.50
Trigger versus unacceptable		t(47) = 23.26, p < .001, d = 3.36	t(47) = 3.27, p = .002, d = 0.47
Neutral versus unacceptable		t(47) = 0.81, p = .422, d = 0.12	t(47) = 2.09, p = .042, d = 0.30
Only again
Sentence type		F(2,94) = 502.61, p < .001, η2p = .91, ε = .76	F(2,94) = 37.73, p < .001, η2p = .45, ε = .73		F(2,94) = 15.37, p < .001, η2p = .25, ε = .71
Trigger versus neutral		t(47) = 13.60, p < .001, d = 1.96	t(47) = 1.58, p = .121, d = 0.23		t(47) = 3.53, p = .001, d = 0.51
Trigger versus unacceptable		t(47) = 23.01, p < .001, d = 3.32	t(47) = 6.04, p < .001, d = 0.87		t(47) = 2.97, p = .005, d = 0.43
Neutral versus unacceptable		t(47) = 25.06, p < .001, d = 3.62	t(47) = 7.07, p < .001, d = 1.02		t(47) = 4.73, p < .001, d = 0.68

The first rows are the statistics for the 3 × 2 ANOVA for each region. In case of a significant interaction, separate ANOVAs with sentence type as a repeated-measure were run. If these were significant, the three sentence types were compared with paired t tests