Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;6(4):e03745. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03745

Table 2.

Urine hrHPV and hrHPV genotype detection compared to cervical samples.

Groups compared Urine samples Cervical samples
Prevalence % (95% CI) Sensitivity % (95% CI) Specificity % (95% CI) PPV % (95% CI) NPV % (95% CI) McNemar p-value Overall percent agreement Positive percent agreement
hrHPV positive hrHPV negative
1, 2, 3 Urine hrHPV detection (compared to cervical hrHPV detection) hrHPV positive 39 2 65.6
(58.3–72.2)
31.5
(23.6–40.5)
96.9
(88.3–99.5)
95.1
(82.2–99.2)
42.6
(34.6–51.0)
<0.001 54.0% 31.5%
hrHPV negative 85 63
hrHPV 16 or 18/45 positive hrHPV 16 or 18/45 negative
1,2 # Urine hrHPV genotyping (compared to cervical hrHPV genotyping) hrHPV 16 or 18/45 positive 4 0 35.1
(23.2–48.9)
20.0
(6.6–44.3)
100
(88.3–100.0)
100
(39.6–100.0)
69.8
(55.5–81.3)
<0.001 71.9% 20.0%
hrHPV 16 or 18/45 negative 16 37

# (57 patients had concurrent genotyping at time of pap smear collection); hrHPV: high-risk human papillomavirus; PPV: Positive predictive value; NPV: Negative predictive value; CI: Confidence interval.