Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 17;27(5):1368–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.12.011

Table 1.

Cytogenetic analysis of A. cepa root tips exposed to different concentrations of DMSO, chili and tomato extracts.

Concentration Bridges Lagging Stickiness Vagrant Binucleated Nuclear Lesions Giant cell c-mitosis Aberrations (%)
DMSO-125 1.8 (0.7) 2.6 (1.14) 1.6 (0.5) 3.2 (0.8) 0.8 (0.8) 2.8 (0.83) 3.4 (0.5) 2.6 (0.5) 7
DMSO-250 4.8 (0.8) 6.2 (1.15) 3.8 (0.6) 3.8 (0.9) 1.6 (0.9) 4.2 (0.84) 4.2 (0.6) 6 (0.6) 12
DMSO-500 1.8 (0.9) 8 (1.16) 4.8 (0.7) 2 (0.1) 3.2 (0.1) 4 (0.85) 5.2 (0.7) 8.6 (0.7) 15
DMSO-1000 7 (0.1) 9.4 (1.17) 7.6 (0.8) 6.2 (0.11) 5.6 (0.11) 9 (0.86) 2.8 (0.8) 15.6 (0.8) 48
Chili-125 4.8 (0.11) 4.4 (1.18) 2.2 (0.9) 3.8 (0.12) 2.2 (0.12) 2.2 (0.87) 1.6 (0.9) 2 (0.9) 10
Chili-250 1.8 (0.12) 6.6 (1.19) 3.8 (0.1) 4.8 (0.13) 3 (0.13) 4.4 (0.88) 5 (0.1) 3.6 (0.1) 13
Chili-500 2.6 (0.13) 9.6 (1.2) 6.8 (0.11) 2.8 (0.14) 4.6 (0.14) 4.2 (0.89) 6.8 (0.11) 4.4 (0.11) 21
Chili-1000 10.2 (0.14) 15 (1.21) 10 (0.12) 4.8 (0.15) 7.2 (0.15) 8.6 (0.9) 9.4 (0.12) 12.8 (0.12) 50
Tomato-125 1.8 (0.15) 3 (1.22) 2.2 (0.13) 4.8 (0.16) 2.2 (0.16) 2 (0.91) 2.8 (0.13) 1.4 (0.13) 8
Tomato-250 3.8 (0.16) 3.6 (1.23) 3 (0.14) 1.4 (0.17) 4.4 (0.17) 5.6 (0.92) 3.6 (0.14) 3.2 (0.14) 12
Tomato-500 4.4 (0.17) 5.8 (1.24) 21.4 (0.15) 3.6 (0.18) 3.4 (0.18) 6.8 (0.93) 5.8 (0.15) 17 (0.15) 23
Tomato-1000 9.2 (0.18) 7 (1.25) 26 (0.16) 4.2 (0.19) 7.8 (0.19) 7 (0.94) 9.2 (0.16) 19 (0.16) 38