Table 1.
Author year | Origin | Age | miRNA measurement technique | Sample type | Studied patients | Identified miRNAs/conclusion | REF |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lian et al. 2009 | China | 22–30 | Microarray assay validation = RT-PCR | Testicular tissue |
NOA = 3 Control = 2 |
Microarray = 19 ↑–154↓ Confirmed with RT-PCR= hsa-hsa-miR-302a, hsa-miR-491-3p, hsa-miR-520d-3p, hsa-miR-383 |
[21] |
Wu et al. 2013 | China |
Case = 28.20 ± 4.02 Controls = 29.25 ± 3.03 |
TaqMan low density array validation = qRT–PCR | Sperm cell |
NOA = 100 Control = 100 |
Hsa-miR-141↑, hsa-miR-429↑, hsa-miR-7-1-3p↑ | [22] |
Khosravi Mashizy et al. 2019 | Iran | NM | RT-PCR | Testicular tissue |
NOA = 40 Control = 40 |
let7↑ | [45] |
Abu-Halima et al. 2014 | Germany | 25.7 ± 3.6 | Microarray assay validation = RT-PCR | Testicular tissue (compared with difference in histological pattern) | AZ = 56 | hsa-mir-34b*, hsa-mir-34b, hsa-mir-34c-5p, hsa-mir-449a, and hsa-mir-449b | [39] |
Abu-Halima et al. 2014 | Germany | NM | RT-PCR | Testicular tissue | NOA = 40Control = 16 |
(hsa-miR-429) ↑ (hsa-miR-34b*, hsa-miR-34b, hsa-miR-34c-5p, hsa-miR-122) ↓ |
[40] |
Zhou et al. 2019 | China |
Case = 26.40 ± 3.98 Control = 28.20 ± 3.56 |
RT-PCR | Sperm cell |
AZ = 30 Control = 30 |
Hsa-miR-525-3p ↓ | [23] |
Tang et al. 2016 | China | 18–41 | RT-PCR | Testicular tissue |
NOA = 19 Control (OA) = 6 |
Hsa-miR-210 ↑ | [24] |
Zhang et al. 2019 | China |
Validation group: NOA = 31.000 ± 4.621 Control = 32.531 ± 5.858 |
Microarray assay validation = RT-PCR | Testicular tissue |
Validation group: NOA = 32 Control = 32 |
Hsa- miR-10b-3p ↑ Hsa- miR-34b-5p ↓ |
[25] |
Fang et al. 2018 | China | 22–45 | Microarray assay validation = RT-PCR | Testicular tissue |
SSR = 5 USR = 5 (All were from NOA patients) |
miRNAs related to sperm function in both groups were identified. | [26] |
Tang et al. 2018 | China |
post-cryptorchidopexy NOA = 23, 26, 28 post-cryptorchidopexy OA = 24, 25, 36 |
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) Validation = RT-PCR |
Testicular tissue |
Post-cryptorchidopexy NOA = 3 post-cryptorchidopexy OA = 3 |
152 miRNAs ↑ 297 miRNAs ↓ |
[27] |
Barceló et al. 2018 | Spain | 21–45 |
Real-time PCR profiling Validation = RT-qPCR |
Semen exosomes |
AZ (spermatogenic failure) = 14 OA = 13 Control = 9 |
hsa-miR-539-5p and hsa-miR-941 | [48] |
Song et al. 2016 | China | NM | RT-PCR | Testicular tissue |
AZ = 16 Control = 8 |
Hsa-miR-188-3p | [28] |
Yao et al. 2017 | China | 25–40 |
RNA deep sequencing Validation = RT-qPCR |
Human spermatogonia, pachytene spermatocytes, round spermatids |
OA = 20 NOA = 60 |
378 microRNAs were differentially expressed in human round spermatids between OA patients and NOA patients | [29] |
Mostafa et al. 2016 | Egypt | 23–39 | RT-PCR | Sperm cell |
Normozoospermic = 52 Fertile normozoospermic Men with Vx = 43 Infertile OAT men without Vx = 62 Infertile OAT men with Vx = 63 |
hsa-miRNA-122, hsa-miRNA-181a, and hsa-miRNA-34c5 were positively correlated with sperm concentration, sperm motility, sperm morphology |
[51] |
Radtke et al. 2019 | Germany |
Case: 29.5 (11.5) Control: 36.5 (8.25) Median (IQR) |
RT-PCR | Seminal plasma |
Patient = 38 Control = 30 |
hsa-miR-371-a-3p is correlated with sperm concentration | [41] |
Wu et al. 2012 | China | 25.42–33.41 | RT-PCR | Seminal plasma |
NOA = 96 OS = 96 Control = 96 |
hsa-miR-19b let-7a ↑ | [30] |
Boellaard et al. 2019 | Netherlands | NM | RT-PCR | Sperm cell | Different samples from urogenital tract | hsa-miR-371a-3p related to sperm concentration | [52] |
Abu-Halima et al. 2012 | Germany |
N = 32.78 ± 5.63 AZS = 34.67 ± 7.87 OA = 31.33 ± 3.94 |
Microarray assay Validation = RT-PCR |
Sperm cell |
N = 9 AZS = 9 OA = 9 |
AS = hsa-miR-34b, hsa-miR-122, hsa-miR-1973 OA = hsa-miR-34b, hsa-miR-34b*, hsa-miR-15b, hsa-miR-34c-5p, hsa-miR-122, hsa-miR-449a, hsa-miR-1973, hsa-miR-16, and hsa-miR-19a |
[42] |
Abhari et al. 2014 | Iran | 27.5 ± 4.8 | RT-PCR | Sperm cell |
OS = 43 Control = 43 |
hsa-miR-21, hsa-miR-22 ↑ | [46] |
Li et al. 2016 | China |
OS = 23–37 OA = 25–28 |
Microarray assay Validation = RT-PCR |
Testicular tissue |
OS = 3 OA = 3 |
33 DE-hsa-miRNAs | [31] |
Abu-Halima et al. 2019 | Germany | 20–35 |
RT-PCR Validation = RT-PCR |
Sperm cell |
OAS = 33 Control = 33 |
hsa-miR-23a/b-3p ↑ | [43] |
Tian et al. 2017 | China | 20–45 | RT-PCR | Sperm cell |
AZS = 36 OS = 36 AZ = 36 OSAS = 36 |
hsa-miR-10a, hsa-miR-10b, hsa-miR-135a, hsa-miR-135b, hsa-miR-888, hsa-miR-891a ↓ | [32] |
Abu-Halima et al. 2016 | Germany | 24–39 |
RT-PCR Validation = RT-PCR |
Semen exosomes |
OAS = 12 Control = 12 |
hsa-miR-765 and hsa-miR-1275 ↑ hsa-miR-15a ↓ |
[44] |
Zhou et al. 2015 | China |
N = 29.00 ± 4.804 AZS = 30.13 ± 5.841 |
RT-PCR | Sperm cell | ASZ = 48Control = 42 | hsa-miR-27b ↓ | [33] |
Zhou et al. 2015 | China | NM | RT-PCR | Seminal plasma |
AZS = 50 Control = 50 |
hsa-miR-101-3p, let-7b-5p ↓ sp-miR-151a-5p ↑ |
[34] |
Wang et al. 2011 | China |
AZ = 29.07 ± 4.67 AZS = 29.41 ± 4.35 OS = 28.82 ± 5.31 Control = 28.63 ± 4.40 |
RT-PCR | Seminal plasma |
AZ = 73 AZS = 79 OS = 34 Control = 68 |
AZ = hsa-miR-34c-5p, hsa-miR-122, hsa-miR-146b-5p, hsa-miR-181a, hsa-miR-374b, hsa-miR-509–5p, and hsa-miR-513a-5p ↓ AZS = hsa-miR-34c-5p, hsa-miR-122, hsa-miR-146b-5p, hsa-miR-181a, hsa-miR-374b, hsa-miR-509–5p, and hsa-miR-513a-5p ↑ |
[35] |
Qing et al. 2017 | China |
AZS = 33.73 ± 6.63 N = 33.00 ± 7.22 |
RT-PCR | Seminal plasma |
AZS = 22 N = 22 |
hsa-miR-891b, hsa-miR-892b, hsa-miR-892a, hsa-miR-888, hsa-miR-890 | [36] |
Zhou et al. 2018 | China | NM |
TaqMan low-density array Validation = RT-PCR |
Seminal plasma |
AZS = 50 N = 50 |
let-7b-5p ↓ | [37] |
Heidary et al. 2018 | Iran |
AZS = 36.7 ± 6.87 Control = 35.7 ± 5.05 |
Illumina high-throughput sequencing Validation = RT-PCR |
Sperm cell |
AS = 39 Control = 35 |
Hsa-miR-888-3p ↑ | [47] |
Salas-Huetos et al. 2014 | Spain | NM | TaqMan array | Sperm cell | 10 males with normal seminogram | None of the miRNAs correlated with sperm motility, morphology or concentration | [53] |
Zhou et al. 2017 | China |
AZS = 33.30 ± 1.46 Control = 29.60 ± 1.05 |
RT-PCR | Sperm cell |
AZS = 20 Control = 20 |
hsa-miR-27a ↑ | [38] |
Salas-Huetos et al. 2015 | Spain | 19–50 | RT-PCR | Sperm cell |
AZS = 10 TS = 10 OS = 10 |
AZS = 32 DE-miRNAs TS = 19 DE-miRNAs OS = 18 DE-miRNAs |
[49] |
Corral-Vazquez et al. 2019 | Spain | NM | RT-PCR | Sperm cell |
AZS = 10 TS = 10 OS = 10 |
AZS = hsa-miR-942-5p/hsa-miR-1208 TS = hsa-miR-296-5p/hsa-miR-328-3p OS = hsa-miR-139-5p/hsa-miR-1260a |
[50] |