Table 3.
Primary outcomes, differences in the cluster-level proportion of men using IPV against a female partner between the intervention and control arms at endpoint
| Endpoint n (%) |
Endpoint – cluster-level proportionsa n (%) |
Difference in proportion at endpoint (95% CI) |
P value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Control | Intervention | Control | ||||
| Physical abuse | 134 (17.54) | 140 (18.97) | 9 (27.68) | 9 (27.89) | 0.002 | (−0.07 to 0.08) | 0.95 |
| Sexual abuse | 115 (15.01) | 122 (16.53) | 9 (17.28) | 9 (18.63) | 0.01 | (− 0.04 to 0.06) | 0.58 |
| Severe IPV | 134 (17.54) | 140 (18.97) | 9 (20.46) | 9 (21.41) | 0.01 | (−0.05 to 0.07) | 0.74 |
aCluster level proportions which aggregated individual-level data at endpoint adjusted for baseline levels of IPV and sociodemographic characteristics
CI confidence interval, IPV interpersonal violence