Table 5.

Marginal effects (ME) of patient and care partner characteristics on dyadic concordance

	Unadjusted ME (95% CI)	Adjusted ME (95% CI)
Impairment level of patient
MCI	REF	REF
Dementia	0.04 (−0.000, 0.08)	0.000 (−0.04, 0.04)
Patient TICS-M	−0.005 (−0.008, −0.002)***	−0.004 (−0.007, −0.001)*
Patient male	0.006 (−0.03, 0.04)	−0.04 (−0.11, 0.04)
Patient Caucasian	−0.06 (−0.14, 0.01)	−0.10 (−0.16,−0.03)**
Patient age	−0.0004 (−0.004, 0.003)	0.000 (−0.004, 0.003)
Patient Education
High school graduate or less	REF	REF
Some college	0.06 (−0.11,−0.009)*	−0.05 (−0.11,−0.001)*
Bachelor’s degree	−0.06 (−0.11,−0.004)*	−0.06 (−0.11,−0.003)*
Graduate degree	−0.07 (−0.11,−0.02)**	−0.07 (−0.12, −0.02)*
Patient health literacy
(1) Always need help	REF	REF
2	−0.03 (−0.09, 0.03)	−0.2 (−0.09, 0.04)
3	−0.07 (−0.13,−0.005)*	−0.05 (−0.12, 0.01)
4	−0.06 (−0.11, 0.007)*	−0.04 (−0.10, 0.02)
(5) Never need help	−0.07 (−0.12, −0.02)**	−0.04 (−0.09, 0.02)
Age difference (patient minus care partner age)	−0.001 (−0.002, 0.001)	−0.003 (−0.006, 0.000)
Care partner TICS-M	0.003 (−0.0001, 0.006)	0.003 (−0.001, 0.006)
Care partner male	−0.03 (−0.07, 0.01)	−0.07 (−0.16, 0.009)
Care partner Caucasian	0.05 (−0.04, 0.15)	0.12 (−0.02, 0.23)
Care partner education
High school graduate or less	REF	REF
Some college	−0.004 (−0.06, 0.05)	−0.000 (−0.06, 0.06)
Bachelor’s degree	0.04 (−0.02, 0.09)	0.04 (−0.02, 0.1)
Graduate degree	−0.002 (−0.06, 0.06)	0.01 (−0.05, 0.08)
Care Partner health literacy
(1) Always need help	REF	REF
2	−0.04 (−0.23, 0.16)	−0.04 (−0.22, 0.1)
3	0.04 (−0.12, 0.19)	0.02 (−0.13, 0.16)
4	0.03 (−0.11, 0.18)	0.007 (−0.13, 0.14)
(5) Never need help	0.08 (−0.06, 0.22)	0.05 (−0.08,0.18)
Care partner’s relationship to patient
Other	REF	REF
Spouse/significant other	−0.01 (−0.06, 0.04)	−0.03 (−0.12, 0.05)
Care Partner’s CAPACITY Communication Score	0.03 (0.004, 0.06)*	0.02 (−0.006, 0.05)

^*p < 0.05;

^**p < 0.01;

^**p < 0.001.