Table 8.
Density | Normal | High | P-value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Methionine | 100% | 130% | 100% | 130% | SEM | Density | MET | Interaction |
IL-6 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 0.54 | 0.53 | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
IL-10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.61 | 0.13 | 0.31 | 0.92 | 0.92 |
TNFα | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.69 | 0.07 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.45 |
HSP70 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.82 | 0.69 | 0.07 | 0.50 | 0.22 | 0.65 |
HSP90 | 1.00 | 0.78 | 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.06 | 0.67 | 0.04 | 0.61 |
AKT | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.91 |
P38MAPK | 1.00 | 1.12 | 1.66 | 1.42 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.88 | 0.58 |
JNK | 1.00 | 1.10 | 1.22 | 0.80 | 0.12 | 0.92 | 0.52 | 0.35 |
1Data are expressed as means (n = 10). The main effects (the stocking density and concentration of supplemental dl-methionine) were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Duncan’s multiple range test was used to compare the treatment means. Means in the same row without a common letter differ significantly (P < 0.05).