Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 24;30(2):293–299. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz162

Table 4.

Single (model 1) and multilevel (models 2 and 3) logistic regression analyses modelling experiences of physical and sexual IPVAW

Physical intimate partner violence Sexual intimate partner violence
Single-level model Multilevel models Single-level model Multilevel models
Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Specific contextual effects
    Gender Equality Index
        Low Reference Reference
        Middle 0.70 (0.54–0.91) 0.78 (0.60–0.99)
            POOR 20% 24%
        High 1.08 (0.81–1.44) 1.08 (0.81–1.45)
            POOR 43% 41%
General contextual effects
    σ2 0.111 (0.034) 0.088 (0.028) 0.076 (0.028) 0.066 (0.025)
    VPC (%) 3.26 2.61 2.26 1.97
    PCV (%) 20.72 16.16
    AU-ROC 0.671 0.691 0.691 0.680 0.694 0.694
    Change in AU-ROC 0.020 0.000 0.014 0.000
Goodness of fit
    DIC 32 360.93 31 916.95 31 916.93 16 003.99 15 907.61 15 906.51
    Change in DIC compared with previous model −443.98 −0.02 −96.38 −1.10

Note: The table informs on both specific and general contextual effects.

POOR: proportion of opposed odds ratios; σ2: variance; VPC: variance partition coefficient; PCV: proportional change in variance; AU-ROC: area under the receiver operator characteristics curve; DIC: Bayesian deviance information criterion.