Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2019 Nov 18;127(5):668–678. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.009

Table 1.

Patient Demographics and Cancer Phenotype

Patients studied by WES Pathogenic variants1 Patients studied by multi-gene panel Pathogenic variants1

Total 29 4 125 5

Male/Female 12/17 0/4 54/71 4/1

Age at UM diagnosis (median, range) 55 (0.25–79) 49 (46–67) 58 (15–87) 58 (50–89)

Patients diagnosed UM at young age (<35) 2 0 12 0
 - Age of patients (years) 0.25, 25 15, 19, 23, 27 (x4), 28 (x2), 29, 31, 33

Treatment
 - Enucleation 5 2 37 2

TNM Stage
 - pT1 4 0 13 1
 - pT2 5 2 26 0
 - pT3 5 0 43 1
 - pT4 1 0 8 0
 - Unknown 14 2 37 3

Clinical outcome
 - Average Follow Up (months) 78 68 102 90.8
 - Alive 22 3 89 4
 - Deceased 6 1 36 1
 - Unknown 1 0 0 0
 - Metastatic UM 5 1 29 2

Bilateral or multiple UM 1 0 4 0

Personal /family history of cancer*: 29 4 125 6
 - BAP1-TPDS 18 2 31 0
 - Lynch Syndrome 0 0 2 1
 - Breast Ovarian 3 1 14 2
 - Familial Melanoma 0 0 3 0
 - Nonspecific 10 1 83 3

Family History of UM + 25 3 2 0
 - BAP1-TPDS 15 2 1 0
 - Lynch Syndrome 0 0 0 0
 - Breast Ovarian 1 0 0 0
 - Nonspecific 9 1 1 0
1)

Pathogenic variants (null or confirmed pathogenic missense) in established hereditary cancer predisposition gene

WES: whole exome sequencing

BAP1-TPDS: BAP1 tumor predisposition syndrome

*

Cancer syndrome classification is based on clinical presentation. Numbers are greater than total because more than one individual may be at risk for more than one syndrome.