Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 23;15(2):116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.02.007

Table 3.

Association between sexting, socio-demographic characteristics, and risky sexual behaviour among respondents using binary logistic regression.

Predictor variables Low risky behaviour (%) High risky sexual behaviour (%) Model 1
Model 2
OR [95% CI] OR [95% CI]
Knowledge of sexting 73 (48.0) 79 (52.0) 1.636 [.790–3.389] 3.069 [.529–17.820]
Enjoyment of sexting 49 (55.1) 40 (44.9) 0.639 [.333–1.224] 0.745 [.130 - .443]
Ever received/sent a sext to a friend 49 (52.1) 45 (47.9) 0.706 [.368–1.355] 0.076 [.013 - .443]
Last time of sexting 36 (52.9) 32 (47.1) 0.539 [2.56–1.135] 1.389 [.272–7.095]
Ever sent a nude picture to her partner 29 (39.7) 44 (60.3) 2.504∗ [1.102–5.690] 2.957 [.513–17.036]
Partner enjoys sexting 32 (42.1) 44 (57.9) 1.702 [.776–3.733] 2.006 [.312–12.891]
Use of smartphones to encourage sexting 63 (43.8) 81 (56.2) 2.068 [.956–4.474] 16.139∗ [2.374–109.696]
Forced by partner to sext 22 (73.3) 8 (26.7) 0.300 [.118 - .768] 2.469 [.251–24.290]
Socio-demographic variables
Age
Less than 18 years old (Ref) 35 (76.1) 11 (23.9) 1.000
18–22 years old 10 (18.9) 43 (81.1) 83.962∗∗ [7.046–1000.537]
23–30 years old 54 (53.5) 47 (46.5) 10.656 [1.275–82.542]
Religion
Christian (Ref) 99 (50.0) 99 (50.0)
Muslim 2 (100.0)
Ethnic group
Yoruba (Ref) 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0) 1.000
Urhobo 2 (4.4) 43 (95.6) 130.612∗ [1.090–15657.333]
Igbo 6 (16.2) 31 (83.8) 10.953 [.138–870.740]
Hausa 2 (100.0)
Ijaw/Epie 89 (80.2) 22 (19.8) 0.186 [.003–13.089]
Academic level
100 Level (Ref) 16 (36.4) 28 (63.6) 1.000
200 Level 27 (67.5) 13 (32.5) 0.293 [.018–4.812]
300 Level 17 (41.5) 24 (58.5) 1.338 [.096–18.578]
400 Level 15 (45.5) 18 (54.5) 8.299 [.552–124.726]
500 Level 24 (57.1) 18 (42.9) 2.554 [.143–45.545]
Income/monthly allowance (N)
5,000 – 10,999 23 (28.8) 57 (71.2) 1.000
11,000 – 16,999 54 (72.0) 21 (28.0) 0.017∗ [.002 - .139]
17,000 – 20,000 22 (48.9) 23 (51.1) 0.072∗ [.007 - .722]
Mode of residence at school
Off-campus (Ref) 66 (55.5) 53 (44.5) 1.000
On-campus 33 (40.7) 48 (59.3) 3.604 [.552–23.520]

Significant at P < 0.01∗∗ or P < 0.05∗; Ref = reference category.