Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 25;6(4):e03852. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03852

Table 9.

Media cost comparison between previously improved media [35] vs. low cost optimized media.

Previously improved media
Low cost optimized media
Reference
[35]
Reference
Present study
Component (g L−1) o L Cost/L (USD) Component (g L−1) o L Cost/L (USD)
Glucose (Merck) 10 $ 0.640 Glucose USP (ChemiPharma) 20 $ 0.037
Peptone (Oxoid) 20 $ 6.740 Isolated soy protein (Ciacomeq SAS) 50 $ 0.200
Yeast extract (Oxoid) 15 $ 1.485 Malt extract (Proquímicas JG SAS) 10.28 $ 0.063
CuSO4 (Scharlau) 0.16 $ 0.077 CuSO4 (Scharlau) 0.16 $ 0.077
(NH4)2SO4 (Merck) 2.6 $ 0.240 (NH4)2SO4 (Merck) 4.91 $ 0.389
Chloramphenicol (SIGMA) 0.1 $ 0.184 Chloramphenicol (SIGMA) 0.1 $ 0.184
H2O for dilution 1 $ 0.001 H2O for dilution 1 $ 0.001
Total $ 9.367 Total $ 0.951
10 % contingencies $ 0.937 10 % contingencies $ 0.095
19 % sales tax $ 1.780 19 % sales tax $ 0.181
Grand total $ 12,084 Grand total $ 1.227
U L−1 (168 h, 0.15 L) 1,373.72 ± 0.37 U L−1 (168 h, 0.15 L) 12,877.31 ± 481.23

The cost of water for dissolving was obtained from the value of m3 of water established by the Waterworks Company for the industrial zone in Bogotá D.C., Colombia, July of 2018 [43].