Table 2.

Relationship between IOP and corneal characteristics for all eyes (n = 102) in pre- and post-surgery.

		PRE			POST
		GAT	CT1	CT2	GAT	CT1	CT2
CH	R	0.067	0.130	0.118	0.157	0.241	0.194
	p	0.502	0.193	0.237	0.116	0.015	0.051
CRF	R	0.380	0.453	0.427	0.428	0.491	0.443
	p	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001	<0.001
simK	R	0.176	0.135	0.128	0.256	0.230	0.266
	p	0.077	0.177	0.200	0.009	0.020	0.007
CCT	R	0.115	0.201	0.268	0.102	0.112	0.139
	p	0.249	0.043	0.006	0.305	0.263	0.164
SER	R	−0.110	−0.157	−0.211	0.012	−0.073	−0.080
	p	0.270	0.116	0.033	0.909	0.467	0.425
VOL	R	0.064	0.149	0.261	−0.057	0.033	0.028
	p	0.523	0.135	0.008	0.568	0.741	0.776
PCC	R	−0.142	−0.111	−0.146	−0.081	−0.113	−0.142
	p	0.154	0.268	0.144	0.419	0.260	0.155
PTA	R				−0.237	−0.244	−0.292
	p				0.016	0.013	0.003
Max.Abl	R				−0.250	−0.241	−0.287
	p				0.011	0.015	0.003

SER, spherical equivalent refraction; simK, simulated keratometry; PCC, posterior corneal curvature, CCT central corneal thickness, PTA percent tissue altered, Max.Abl maximum corneal ablation, CH corneal hysteresis, CRF corneal resistance factor, VOL corneal volume, IOP intraocular pressure. GAT Goldmann applanation tonometer, CT1-CT2 convex tonometer. R- Correlation coefficient; p -value for correlation.

Comparison between pre- and post-surgery considering all the cases: Pearson or Spearman’s correlation coefficient, depending on the data normality. Present significant differences are marked in cursive bold.