Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 27;10:7053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64013-4

Table 5.

Inter-observer error between the main and second observer (n = 36).

Mean (bias) Mean 95%CI Standard deviation- sd Lower LE = Mean-1.96*sd Higher LE = Mean+ 1.96*sd Regression bias
M GAT pre - L GAT pre 0.028 −0.364–0.420 1.158 −2.243 2.298

b = −0.014;

p = 0.829

M GAT post - L GAT post 0.056 −0.372–0.483 1.264 −2.421 2.532

b = −0.154;

p = 0.137

M CT1 pre - L CT1 pre 0.472 −0.152–1.096 1.844 −3.141 4.086

b = 0.000;

p = 0.999

M CT1 post - L CT1 post 0.333 −0.165–0.832 1.474 −2.555 3.222 b = −0.089; p = 0.346
M CT2 pre - L CT2 pre 0.028 −0.493–0.549 1.540 −2.990 3.046 b = −0.045; p = 0.493
M CT2 post - L CT2 post −0.389 −0.968–0.190 1.712 −3.744 2.966 b = −0.183; p = 0.069

GAT, Goldmann applanation tonometer; CT1-CT2, convex tonometer; M, main observer; L second observer. LE, limit of agreement; p, probability value for regression; b, regression coefficient.

The mean difference between measurements was computed and the absence of differences was tested with the Wilcoxon or paired sample t-test; the Bland-Altman analysis was used; and the ICC was calculated based on absolute-agreement.

Present significant differences are marked in cursive bold.