Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 19;19(6):3738–3750. doi: 10.3892/etm.2020.8611

Table I.

Characteristics of studies included.

            Age    
First author (year) Country of origin Diagnosis Etiology Number of method participants Gender MB NB Study conclusions (Based on P-values) (Refs.)
Chambi-Rocha (2018) Spain NS Airflow sensor MB: 56 NB: 42 NS 7-9 y & 10-16 y& 7-9 y 10-16 y ● Greater palatal length in MB ● Increased LAFH in MB (30)
El Aouame (2016) Morocco NS NS MB: 23 NB: 30 MB: (M, 12; F, 11) NB: (M, 13; F, 17) 16 y 8 m±NR 14 y 4 m±NR ● Mandibular retrusion in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Increased TAFH and decreased PFH in MB (29)
Agostinho (2015) Spain Allergic rhinitis Standard questionnaire & CE MB: 35 NB: 35 MB: (M, 24; F, 11) NB: (M, 17; F, 18) 10 y 2 m±NR 11 y 5 m±NR ● Increased LAFH in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Shorter maxillary and mandibular length in MB (7)
Chung Leng Muñoz (2014) Spain questionnaire & CE NS Standard MB: 53 NB: 65 MB: (M, 33; F, 20) NB: (M, 34; F, 31) M: 10.06±1.5 F: 9.3±1.8 M: 10.58±1.1 F: 10.36±1.1 ● Mandibular retrusion in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Greater inclination of OP in MB (28)
Basheer (2014) Saudi Arabia Group 1: Enlarged adenoids and nasopharynx obstruction of 60% Group 2: No nasal obstruction CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB1: 20 MB2: 20 NB: 10 NS 6-12 y 6-12 y ● Increase in maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination in MB ● Convex facial profile in MB (8)
Souki (2012) Brazil Adeno-tonsillar hypertrophy CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB: 126 NB: 126 MB: (M, 73; F, 53) NB: (M, 65; F, 61) 6 y 3 m±2 y 1 m 6 y 9 m±1 y 11 m ● Increase in maxillary and mandibular incisor proclination in MB (34)
Malhotra (2012) India NS CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB: 54 NB: 46 M, 66 F, 34 6-9 y & 9-12 y 6-9 y & 9-12 y ● Greater TAFH and LAFH in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Greater inclination of gonial angle in MB (27)
Ucar (2012) Turkey NS CE MB: 34 NB: 32 MB: (M, 16; F, 18) NB: (M, 8; F, 24) 12.8±1.5 y 13.5±1.3 y ● Retrognathic maxilla in MB ● Greater TAFH in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Increase in mandibular incisor proclination in MB ● Posterior rotation of palatal plane in MB (6)
Bakor (2011) Brazil Allergic rhinitis, obstructive hypertrophy of the palatine and/or pharyngeal tonsils, and nasal septum deviation CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB: 10 NB: 10 MB: (M, 3; F, 7) NB: (M, 7; F, 3) 12.7±1.7 y 13.9±2.6 y ● Reduced facial index in MB ● Reduced maxillary width in MB (3)
D'Ascanio (2010) Italy Nasal septal deviation CE, nasopharyngoscopy, rhinomanometry MB: 98 NB: 98 MB: (M, 59; F, 39) NB: (M, 26; F, 35) 7-12 y NS ● Greater UAFH and TAFH in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Increased gonial angle in MB ● Increased palatal height and overjet in MB ● Retrognathic maxilla and mandible in MB (33)
Harari (2010) Israel Nasal obstruction CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB: 55 NB: 61 MB: (M, 28; F, 27) NB: (M, 26; F, 35) 12.49±1.94 y 12.55±2.11 y ● Backward and downward rotation of mandible in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Higher palatal plane in MB ● Narrowing of upper and lower arches in MB (4)
Cuccia (2008) Italy NS History & parental reporting MB: 35 NB: 35 MB: (M,14; F, 21) NB: (M,16; F, 19) 8.8±2.2 y 9.7±1.6 y ● Hyperdivergent growth pattern in MB (9)
Juliano (2009) Brazil NS History & parental reporting MB: 52 NB: 90 NS 10.4±2.06 y 10.83±1.8 y ● Retrognathic mandible in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Greater inclination of OP in MB (26)
Frasson (2006) Brazil NS Standard questionnaire, CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB: 25 NB: 25 MB: (F, 25) NB: (F, 25) 9-12 y 9-12 y ● No difference between MB and NB (10)
Lessa (2005) Brazil Severe nasal obstruction CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB: 30 NB: 30 MB: (M, 7; F, 23) NB: (M, 14; F, 16) 6-10 y 6-10 y ● Decreased PFH and Increased LAFH in MB ● Greater inclination of MP in MB (32)
Mattar (2004) Brazil Severe nasopharyngeal obstruction CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB: 44 NB: 29 NS 3-6 y 3-6 y ● Greater inclination of MP and palatal plane in MB ● Dolicocephalic pattern in MB ● Decreased PFH in MB ● Narrow maxillary arch in molar region in MB (25)
Faria (2002) Brazil Severe nasopharyngeal obstruction CE & nasopharyngoscopy MB: 20 NB: 15 NS 7-10 y 7-10 y ● Greater inclination of MP in MB ● Retrognathic maxilla and mandible in MB (24)
Trask (1987) USA Allergic rhinitis Standard questionnaire & CE MB: 25 NB: 25 NS 5 y 7 m-13 y5 m 5 y 1 m-14 y 11 m ● Greater inclination of MP and palatal plane in MB ● Increased gonial angle in MB ● Greater TAFH and LAFH in MB ● Retruded mandible in MB ● Deeper palatal height in MB ● Retroclined mandibular incisors in MB (23)
Bresolin (1983) USA Allergic rhinitis Standard questionnaire & CE MB: 30 NB: 15 NS 6-12 y 6-12 y ● Greater UAFH and TAFH in MB ● Greater inclination of MP and palatal plane in MB ● Increased gonial angle in MB ● Retruded maxilla and mandible in MB ● Deeper palatal height in MB ● Narrow maxillary arch in molar region in MB (31)

Age is expressed as the range/mean ± standard deviation. MB, mouth breathers; NB, nasal breathers; NS, not specified; NR, not reported; M, males; F, females; y, years; m, months; CE, clinical examination; TAFH, total anterior facial height; LAFH, lower anterior facial height; UAFH, upper anterior facial height; PFH, posterior facial height; MP, mandibular plane; OP, occlusal plane.