Table 2.
Sample 1 | Sample 2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Variable | M | SD | Range | Variable | M | SD | Range |
MSSD | 21.46 | 22.56 | 0–136 | MSSD | 10.27 | 8.63 | .17–.43.31 |
MIS | 7.48 | 2.54 | 4.00–14.50 | MISa | 4.03 | 2.21 | .25–11.50 |
NU | 2.36 | .50 | 1.00–3.33 | NU | 2.33 | .59 | 1.17–3.83 |
PU | 2.00 | .59 | 1.00–3.43 | PU | 1.84 | .59 | 1.00–4.00 |
SS | 3.15 | .53 | 1.67–4.00 | SS | 3.08 | .57 | 1.42–4.00 |
LPer | 1.83 | .44 | 1.00–3.10 | Per | 3.11 | .54 | 1.70–4.00 |
LPlan | 1.93 | .47 | 1.09–3.18 | Plan | 3.17 | .45 | 1.27–4.00 |
bGS | 31.04 | 18.50 | .00–80.00 | ||||
fGS | 24.55 | 18.58 | .00–70.00 | ||||
bIMT | .35 | .15 | .06–.68 | ||||
fIMT | .33 | .16 | .03–.74 | ||||
bTCIP | 16.73 | 12.80 | .00–50.00 | ||||
fTCIP | 21.40 | 18.73 | .00–50.00 |
Note. M = mean; SD = standard deviation; MSSD = mean squared successive difference of MIS scores; MIS = aggregate MIS scores (averaged across 10 days of assessment); NU = UPPS-P negative urgency; PU = UPPS-P positive urgency; SS = UPPS-P sensation seeking; LPer = UPPS-P lack of perseverance; Per = UPPS-P perseverance; LPlan = UPPS-P lack of planning; Plan = UPPS-P planning; bGS = baseline GoStop percentage of response inhibition failures; fGS = follow-up GoStop percentage of response inhibition failures; bIMT = baseline IMT ratio; fIMT = follow-up IMT ratio; bTCIP = baseline number of immediate choices; fTCIP = follow-up number of immediate choices; Sample 1 baseline n = 75–77; Sample 1 follow-up n = 63–66. Sample 2 baseline n = 126–147.
MIS scores from Sample 2 (i.e., using a 0–100 sliding scale) were rescaled by dividing by 20 to facilitate direct comparisons between samples.