Table 3.
MSSDa | MIS | NU | PU | SS | Per | Plan | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSSDa | - | .46** [.32, .58] | −.02 [−.33, .29] | .11 [−.21, .40] | .15 [−.17, .44] | −.01 [−.32, .30] | −.04 [−.34, .27] |
MIS | .68** [.53, .78] | - | .42* [.28, .55] | .43** [.29, .56] | .00 [−.16, .17] | −.26** [−.41, −.10] | −.24** [−.39, −.08] |
NU | .02 [−.21, .25] | .58** [.41, .71] | - | .65** [.55, .74] | −.04 [−.20, .12] | −.39** [−.52, −.24] | −.25** [−.40, −.09] |
PU | .18 [−.05, .40] | .57** [.39, .70] | .70** [.56, .80] | - | .20* [.04, .35] | −.22** [−.37, −.06] | −.30** [−.44, −.14] |
SS | −.10 [−.33, .13] | .25* [.02, .45] | .38** [.16, .55] | .39** [.17, .56] | - | .17 [−.00, .32] | −.14 [−.30, .02] |
LPer | −.06 [−.28, .18] | .11 [−.12, .33] | .33** [.11, .52] | .13 [−.10, .34] | .05 [−.18, .27] | - | .42** [.28, .55] |
LPlan | .03 [−.20, .26] | .28* [.05, .48] | .46** [.26, .62] | .44** [.24, .60] | .26* [.03, .45] | .39** [.18, .56] | − |
Note.
p < .01
p < .05; MSSD = mean squared successive difference of MIS scores; MIS = aggregate MIS scores (averaged across 10 days of assessment); NU = UPPS-P negative urgency; PU = UPPS-P positive urgency; SS = UPPS-P sensation seeking; LPer = UPPS-P lack of perseverance; LPlan = UPPS-P lack of planning. Correlations from Sample 1 (daily diary sample) are included below the diagonal, whereas correlations from Sample 2 (EMA sample) are included above the diagonal. UPPS-P perseverance (per) and UPPS-P planning (plan) were scored such that higher scores reflect higher perseverance and planning in Sample 2, as opposed to (lack of) perseverance and planning. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals are contained in brackets.
Correlations with MSSD of MIS scores reflect partial correlations after accounting for aggregate MIS scores consistent with Dejonckheere et al. (2019). Sample 1 Level-2 n = 74–76; Sample 2 Level-2 n = 126–147.