Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Res Pers. 2020 Jan 15;85:103914. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103914

Table 3.

Between-Person Bivariate Correlations between UPPS-P Impulsivity Facets and MIS Scores

MSSDa MIS NU PU SS Per Plan
MSSDa - .46** [.32, .58] −.02 [−.33, .29] .11 [−.21, .40] .15 [−.17, .44] −.01 [−.32, .30] −.04 [−.34, .27]
MIS .68** [.53, .78] - .42* [.28, .55] .43** [.29, .56] .00 [−.16, .17] −.26** [−.41, −.10] −.24** [−.39, −.08]
NU .02 [−.21, .25] .58** [.41, .71] - .65** [.55, .74] −.04 [−.20, .12] −.39** [−.52, −.24] −.25** [−.40, −.09]
PU .18 [−.05, .40] .57** [.39, .70] .70** [.56, .80] - .20* [.04, .35] −.22** [−.37, −.06] −.30** [−.44, −.14]
SS −.10 [−.33, .13] .25* [.02, .45] .38** [.16, .55] .39** [.17, .56] - .17 [−.00, .32] −.14 [−.30, .02]
LPer −.06 [−.28, .18] .11 [−.12, .33] .33** [.11, .52] .13 [−.10, .34] .05 [−.18, .27] - .42** [.28, .55]
LPlan .03 [−.20, .26] .28* [.05, .48] .46** [.26, .62] .44** [.24, .60] .26* [.03, .45] .39** [.18, .56]

Note.

**

p < .01

*

p < .05; MSSD = mean squared successive difference of MIS scores; MIS = aggregate MIS scores (averaged across 10 days of assessment); NU = UPPS-P negative urgency; PU = UPPS-P positive urgency; SS = UPPS-P sensation seeking; LPer = UPPS-P lack of perseverance; LPlan = UPPS-P lack of planning. Correlations from Sample 1 (daily diary sample) are included below the diagonal, whereas correlations from Sample 2 (EMA sample) are included above the diagonal. UPPS-P perseverance (per) and UPPS-P planning (plan) were scored such that higher scores reflect higher perseverance and planning in Sample 2, as opposed to (lack of) perseverance and planning. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals are contained in brackets.

a

Correlations with MSSD of MIS scores reflect partial correlations after accounting for aggregate MIS scores consistent with Dejonckheere et al. (2019). Sample 1 Level-2 n = 74–76; Sample 2 Level-2 n = 126–147.