Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;12:2767–2775. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S246566

Table 4.

Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Prognostic Factors in GC Patients

Factors Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age(years) 0.001 0.012
 <60 1 1
 ≥60 3.307 (1.688–6.478) 2.406 (1.213–4.77)
Sex 0.045
 Female 1
 Male 1.776 (1.013–3.115)
Tumor size (cm) <0.001
 <3 1
 ≥3 3.495 (1.871–6.528)
Tumor Location
 Upper third 0.894 (0.473–1.69) 0.73
 Middle third 1.496 (0.856–2.617) 0.158
 Lower third 1
Histological grade 0.446
 Well differentiated 1
 Poorly differentiated 0.77 (0.393–1.508)
FAR <0.001
 <0.086 1
 ≥0.086 2.621 (1.618–4.244)
CEA (ng/mL) 0.001
 <3.2 1
 ≥3.2 2.296 (1.421–3.71)
NLR <0.001
 <2.17 1
 ≥2.17 3.063 (1.799–5.213)
CEA-FAR
 0 1 1
 1 2.87 (1.636–5.034) <0.001 1.642 (0.922–2.923) 0.092
 2 4.918 (2.463–9.82) <0.001 2.308 (1.13–4.716) 0.022
TNM Stage
 Ⅰ 1 1
 Ⅱ 5.609 (1.243–25.311) 0.025 5.049 (1.106–23.057) 0.037
 Ⅲ 20.615 (5.023–84.615) <0.001 18.759 (4.354–80.812) <0.001

Note: CEA-FAR: CEA<3.2 and FAR<0.086 represent 0, CEA≥3.2 or FAR≥0.086 represent 1, CEA≥3.2 and FAR≥0.086 represent 2.

Abbreviations: GC, gastric cancer; CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; FAR, fibrinogen/albumin ratio; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio.