Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 18;45(1):10–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.03.008

Table 2.

Observed frequency compared with expected frequency of virus co-detections using the exact binomial test.

HAdV HCoV IFAV HBoV HEV HMPV HRSV HRV KIPyV HPIV WUPyV
HAdV 0.53 0.38 0.15 1.00 0.09 0.09 0.003 1.00 0.28 1.00
1/3 2/1 8/5 0/1 0/3 0/3 5/16 1/1 0/2 1/1
HCoV 0.12 1.00 0.65 0.19 0.03 <0.0001 0.12 0.12 0.12
0/3 8/9 0/1 2/5 1/6 5/27 0/3 0/3 0/3
IFAV 0.5 1.00 0.78 0.04 <0.0001 1.00 0.28 1.00
3/5 0/1 2/3 0/4 2/17 1/1 0/2 1/2
HBoV 0.73 0.01 0.01 0.004 0.48 0.5 0.02
8/5 3/11 3/10 32/51 6/5 3/5 11/5
HEV 1.00 0.65 0.85 0.48 1.00 0.14
1/1 0/1 6/7 1/2 1/1 0/1
HMPV 0.001 <0.0001 0.57 0.04 0.2
0/7 7/34 1/3 0/4 2/3
HRSV 0.001 0.56 0.02 0.2
12/36 4/3 0/4 1/4
HRV 0.12 <0.0001 0.54
9/15 1/18 14/17
KIPyV 0.65 0.04
0/1 4/1
HPIV 1.00
1/2
WUPyV

Probability (p-values, significant associations, p < 0.05, shown in bold) of the observed number of co-detections compared with the expected number of co-detections, based on the expected frequency of co-detections were calculated as prevalence of first virus x prevalence of second virus. Observed/expected.