Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 16;37(11):515–AP1. doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(11)37066-3

Table 2.

Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Outcomes for 2009 H1N1 Simulations*

Observed PPE Use by StaffN (%)
 Eye 51/84 (61)

 Gown/gloves 73/84 (87)

 Respirator 68/84 (81)

  PAPR 5/84 (6)

  N95 63/84 (75)

  No respirator 16/84 (19)

Previously fit tested for N95 respirator 73/87 (84)

Prior training

 Enhanced droplet precautions 53/87 (61)

 Powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) 39/87 (45)

 Medical simulation 79/87 (91)

Confidence in use of PPE before training

 Confident 56/87 (64)

 Not confident 13/87 (15)

 Neither agree/disagree 18/87 (21)

Confidence in use of PPE after training

 Confident 74/87 (85)

 Not confident 4/87 (5)

 Neither agree/disagree 9/87 (10)
*

The mean number of participants per simulation was 7.6 ± 3.2. N95, filtering facepiece respirator (3M, St. Paul).

The total number of participants who completed the surveys was 87. Review of mock code videos allowed for documentation of PPE used by 84 participants.