Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 28;175(1):85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.04.025

Table 3.

Evaluation of the specificity of mAbs against Influenza A viruses by indirect ELISA (immobilised antigen), sandwich ELISA (antigen in solution) and western blot.

mAb no. Indirect ELISA
Sandwich ELISAa
Western blot
H5 virusesb Other virusesb H5 virusesb Other virusesb H5 virusesb Subtype H1 virus
20/1/E6 10/11 16/19 7/11 10/19 11/11 1/1
107/1/E4 7/11 15/19 8/11 6/19 11/11 1/1
140/1/D9 7/11 13/19 9/11 4/19 11/11 1/1
10/1/D6 9/11 4/19 8/11 None 8/11 1/1
1/03/F2 10/11 None 7/11 Nonec 10/11 0/1
23/3/G5 10/11 None 4/11 Nonec 9/11 0/1
492/3/E6 9/11 None 8/11 None 9/11 0/1
21/03/D2 8/11 None 5/11 Nonec 9/11 0/1
157/1/F4 9/11 None 8/11 None 10/11 0/1
132/03/D8 7/11 None 5/11 Nonec 8/11 1/1
22/03/D9 6/11 None 6/11 Nonec 9/11 0/1

Given are the number of virus isolates detected by the mAb and the number of viruses tested, respectively. mAb = monoclonal antibody.

a

Capture Ab = rabbit anti-H5N1 polyclonal antibody, detector Ab = biotinylated mAb.

b

See Table 1.

c

Reactions with other influenza A viruses were only analysed for subtypes H1, H3, and H7.