Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Transplant. 2018 Sep 17;19(3):724–736. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15067

TABLE 4.

Outcome in control and therapy group of sensitized monkeys after kidney transplantation. (Posttransplant histology; comparison treatment group/control group; in order of survival time)

Animal Survival (d) ACR AMR score (Banff) Other indications
Control (n = 6)a g ptc C4d total
 Monkey 5  44 borderline 1 2 3 6 AMR, borderline AR
 Monkey 6   1 none 2 2 2 6 AMR, TMA, hyperacute rejection
 Monkey 8   7 none 3 0 2 5 AMR, TMA
 Monkey 9  27 borderline 3 1 2 6 AMR, borderline AR
 Monkey 10  43 Banff IIB 3 2 2 7 AMR + ACR
 Monkey 11   8 none 3 1 2 6 AMR, TMA
AMR score median 6 (IQR 5.75−7)
Therapy (n = 5)b
 Monkey 23   8 none 2 1 3 6 AMR, TMA
 Monkey 21  16 none 0 1 1 2 CMV + nephritis
 Monkey 25  21 none 3 1 0 4 AMR, CMV + nephritis
 Monkey 22  41 none 2 0 0 2 CMV + nephritis
 Monkey 24 >120 Banff IB 1 0 0 1 ACR1B
AMR score median 2 (IQR 1−5)

AR, acute rejection; AMR, antibody-mediated rejection; g, glomerulitis; ptc, peritubular capillary inflammation; C4d, C4d deposition in walls of peritubular capillaries (immunohistochemistry); TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; CMV, cytomegalovirus.

a

Monkey 7 (POD3) is excluded from control.

b

Monkey 20 (POD0) is excluded from therapy group for technical complications.