Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 23;73(15):1890–1900. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.055

Table 2.

Estimated treatment effects in older adults comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to no PCI on the risk of in hospital mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock by propensity score subclass.

Propensity Score Subclass1 Treatment N (%) Events (%) OR 95% CI p-value
1 PCI 1,263 (36) 560 (44) 0.44 0.38 – 0.50 <0.001
No PCI 2,283 (64) 1,473 (65)
2 PCI 958 (40) 444 (46) 0.53 0.45 – 0.62 <0.001
No PCI 1,441 (60) 894 (62)
3 PCI 1,627 (41) 748 (46) 0.50 0.44 – 0.57 <0.001
No PCI 2,374 (59) 1,489 (63) -
4 PCI 2,034 (45) 868 (43) 0.47 0.42 – 0.53 <0.001
No PCI 2,542 (55) 1,557 (61)
5 PCI 4,525 (45) 1,532 (41) 0.47 0.41 – 0.49 <0.001
No PCI 3,727 (55) 2762 (61)

Abbreviations: OR = Odds Ratio; CI = confidence interval

1

Propensity Score: Using logistic regression, the propensity score was estimated by modeling the associations of the following covariates with treatment (percutaneous coronary intervention) given the covariates: gender, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary circulation disorder, chronic lung disease, renal failure, liver disorder, coagulopathy, weight loss, electrolyte imbalance, blood loss, and alcoholism.