Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 23;73(15):1890–1900. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.01.055

Online Table 3.

Estimated treatment effects in older adults comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to no PCI on the risk of in hospital mortality after ST-elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock by propensity score subclass excluding patients who died within the first week of hospital admission.

Propensity Score Subclass1 Treatment N (%) Events (%) OR 95% CI p-value
1 PCI 768 (43) 187 (24) 0.71 0.57 – 087 0.001
No PCI 1,019 (57) 318 (31)
2 PCI 1,065 (47) 214 (20) 0.69 0.57 – 0.85 <0.001
No PCI 1,195 (53) 315 (27)
3 PCI 654 (50) 116 (18) 0.76 0.57 – 0.99 0.047
No PCI 660 (50) 146 (22) -
4 PCI 1,456 (51) 187 (13) 0.60 0.49 – 0.74 <0.001
No PCI 1,415 (49) 278 (20)
5 PCI 2,491 (54) 275 (11) 0.55 0.46 – 0.65 <0.001
No PCI 2,157 (46) 399 (19)

Abbreviations: OR = Odds Ratio; CI = confidence interval

1

Propensity Score: Using logistic regression, the propensity score was estimated by modeling the associations of the following covariates with treatment (percutaneous coronary intervention) given the covariates: gender, race, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary circulation disorder, chronic lung disease, renal failure, liver disorder, coagulopathy, weight loss, electrolyte imbalance, blood loss, and alcoholism.