Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 15;9(2):194–203. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.02.005

Table 7.

The aggregation results using FGM (only positive comparisons are shown).

r˜ij TFN
r˜12 (1.29, 3.09, 4.35)
r˜14 (3.26, 5.45, 7.52)
r˜15 (0.93, 2.34, 4.14)
r˜24 (2.08, 4.22, 6.26)
r˜31 (0.92, 2.21, 3.56)
r˜32 (1.10, 2.04, 3.70)
r˜34 (2.38, 4.57, 6.64)
r˜35 (0.75, 2.01, 3.35)
r˜52 (0.69, 1.40, 2.43)
r˜54 (4.22, 6.26, 8.28)