Table 2.
Characteristics of the retrieved studies regarding animal interventions for inpatient children. The table reported information about the study design, the participant characteristics (sample size, disease, and setting), the intervention type (including length and animal used), the considered outcomes and the main results.
| Authors and Year | Study Design | Sample | Disease/setting | Intervention Type | Length | Animals | Outcome | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barker, 2015 | RCT | 40 hospitalized children | Children admitted to Hospital of Richmond except Pediatric Intensive Care Units | Intervention group: AAI Active control group: jigsaw puzzle |
10 min sessions | Dogs | Pain and Anxiety ratings Attachments Questionnaire for Children Family life-space Diagrams |
The AAI-group experienced lower post-intervention anxiety scores (p < 0.05). No significant within- or between-group pre-post changes in either pain or anxiety were detected. |
| Tsai, 2010 | Quasi-experimental design | 15 hospitalized children | Acute or chronic conditions | AAT (taking place in patient room) Control group: puzzle (each child did both the interventions) |
6–10 min sessions | Dogs | Blood pressure and heart rate Child Medical Fear Scale State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAI-C) |
Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) decreased from before, during and after AAT (p = 0.008). Children’s anxiety and medical fear did not differ after the AAT visit compared with the comparison intervention. |
| Braun 2009 | Quasi-experimental intervention study | 57 children | Acute care settings | Intervention group: AAT Control group: children sat quietly for 15 min | 15–20 min sessions | Dogs | Blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate Pain level (FACE pain scale) |
The group experiencing AAT had a significantly lower post-test pain score compared to the control group (p = 0.006). Even parents perception of pain reduction was higher for the intervention group (p = 0.008). AAT group presented higher respiratory rate (p = 0.011), no differences were found in blood pressure and pulse |
| Caprilli 2006 | RCT | 138 children | Different hospital wards | AAA | Once a week for 2-h sessions | Dogs | Children participation Infection rate in the hospital Children pleasure Parents and staff level of satisfaction |
No increase in infection or in contagious disease transmitted by dogs were found. The children pleasure evaluation showed significant improvement. Parents and staff satisfaction rate was high. |
| Gagnon 2004 | Descriptive study | 16 parents and 12 nurses | Pediatric oncology wards | Dog-AAT | Each session lasted a whole day | Dogs | Satisfaction with the program and of quality of care | Beneficial role of animal therapy was underlined for physical, social, emotional, coping and self-esteem dimension |
| Bouchard 2004 | Pilot project | 27 children | Pediatric oncology wards | AAT with a dog at bed-side | / | Dogs | Client satisfaction Impact on nursing work Appropriateness of prevention measures |
Parents outlined positive aspects of the experience (as increasing children confidence, mood improvement). According to nurses, the program was well structured. They used the children’s relationship with dogs as a therapeutic tool during the intervention process. |
| Kaminski 2002 | Clinical trial on a convenience sample | 70 hospitalized children | General inpatients | Intervention group: dog-facilitated therapy Control group: Child Life group |
One session per week | Dogs | Self-reported mood, and parents and caregiver reports Clinical assessment Physiological indicators: heart rate, blood pressure, salivary cortisol |
Parents and caregivers rated their children as happier after intervention in both groups (p < 0.001). Heart rate was significantly higher in the pet therapy group (99.27 ± 16.38) than in control group (88.44 ± 12.68). |
| Moody et al. 2002 | Two cross-sectional surveys | Staff Questionnaire: 115 pre-program and 45 after | Pediatric Medical wards | Pet-visitation program | / | Dogs | Hospital staff perception (questionnaire to administrators, doctors, nursing staff and therapists; 6 weeks before and 12 weeks after the introduction of the program) | Prior to the introduction of the dog visitation, there were high staff expectations regarding the program. Healthcare workers outlined the relaxation effect, the mood improvement. Staff member generally accepted dogs. |