Table 3.
Specificity and time to detection for five algorithms based on the optimize combinations of parameter value.
| Algorithms | Specificity (%) |
Time to detection (d) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Test lower CI | Mean | Test lower CI | |
| EWMA (0.7, 3.0) | 95.2 | <0.001 | 0.1 | >0.0125 |
| C1′ (0.4, 5σ) | 95.7 | <0.001 | 1.0 | <0.001 |
| C2′ (0.5, 4σ) | 89.2 | <0.001 | 0.8 | <0.001 |
| C3′ (0.8, 3σ) | 73.7 | <0.001 | 0.7 | <0.001 |
| Space–time permutation scan statistic (3d, 2 km) ⁎ | 99.9 | — | 0.2 | — |
Space–time permutation scan served as control group. According to Bonferroni’s procedure, the family wise error rate was 0.05, divided by the number of test. The significance level α for an individual test was 0.05/4, being 0.0125.