Skip to main content
. 2006 Dec 22;40(3):685–692. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.10.026

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Histological data compared between the PE group and the CON group. A: A lower ON incidence was found in the PE group (5/16) than the CON group (13/14) (P < 0.05). B: No difference was found in number of lesions per ON+ rabbit between the CON group and the PE group (P > 0.05). C: A lower thrombus incidence was found in the PE group (3/16) than the CON group (11/14) (P < 0.05). D: The size of fat cells was found significantly lower in the PE group (n = 16) than the CON group (n = 14) (P < 0.05).