Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 24;11(4):217–242. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v11.i4.217

Table 7.

Critical appraisal of observational cohort and cross-sectional studies using the National Institutes of health study quality checklists

Al Saeed et al[42], 2015 Al-Eisa and Al-Sobayel[36], 2012 Al-Habsi et al[32], 2015 Al-Malki et al[38], 2003 Al-Shammari et al[33], 2015 Alabdulkarim et al[81], 2018 Albawardi et al[27], 2017 Alsaeed et al[43], 2017 Bener et al[45], 2017 Carter et al[34], 2004 Khalid[37], 2007 Rudat et al[44], 2012 Sayegh et al[35], 2016
Was the research question or objective clearly stated? Y Y Y N N N Y Y Y Y Y N Y
Was the study population clearly specified and defined? Y N Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Was the participation rate of eligible persons at least 50%? CD Y Y (but N for accelerometer) Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y NA NA
Were all subjects selected or recruited from the same or similar populations? Were inclusion/exclusion criteria prespecified? N Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Was a sample size justification, power description or variance and effect estimates provided? N N N N Y N Y Y Y Y Y N N
Was the exposure of interest measured prior to the outcome being measured? Y N N N N Y N Y N N N N Y
Was the timeframe sufficient for an association to be seen? Y N N N N Y N N N N N N Y
For exposures that can vary in amount or level, did the study examine different levels of the exposure as related to the outcome? Y N Y NA Y NA Y NA Y Y Y Y Y
Were the exposure measures (independent variables) clearly defined, valid and reliable and implemented consistently across all study participants? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y CD Y Y Y Y Y
Was the exposure measured more than once over time? N Y Y N N Y N N N N N N Y

Available online at https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Y: Yes; N: No; CD: Cannot determine; NA: Not applicable; NR: Not reported; BMI: Body mass index; PA: physical activity.