Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;11:684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00684

TABLE 1.

Descriptives, cognitive background information, and reliability of the vocabulary learning task.

Group Children (C) Young adults (YA) Older adults (OA) ANOVA*
n
Age (years)
24 (f = 13)
M = 12.3
SD = 1.3
30 (f = 17)
M = 21.5
SD = 4.4
24 (f = 9)
M = 59.3
SD = 5.1

Basketball experience
(years)
Training per week
(number of sessions)
Still playing actively (percentage)
M = 4.2
SD = 1.9
M = 3.3
SD = 1.3
100%
M = 11.8
SD = 5.3
M = 3.5
SD = 1.2
100%
M = 40.5
SD = 5.4
M = 1.1
SD = 0.2
46%
OA > YA > C,
F(2,50) = 244.20, p < 0.001
YA = C > OA,
F(2,54) = 18.71, p < 0.001

Digit symbol substitution
(cognitive speed; items per second)
M = 0.5
SD = 0.1
M = 0.7
SD = 0.2
M = 0.5
SD = 0.1
YA > C = OA,
F(2,75) = 16.71, p < 0.001

D2 (sustained attention, score) M = 114.0
SD = 29.7
M = 120.4
SD = 19.4
M = 136.3
SD = 42.8
OA = YA > C,
F(2,75) = 3.25, p < 0.05

MWT-A (vocabulary, number of correct
solutions)
M = 21.4
SD = 4.0
M = 28.2
SD = 3.2
M = 31.9
SD = 1.7
OA > YA > C,
F(2,75) = 68.15, p < 0.001

Immediate recall accuracy [%]
German word (GW)
Pseudo word (PW)
93.19
87.71
97.61
92.00
94.72
85.28
GW > PW, F(1,75) = 56.54, p < 0.001
No sign. main effect of age group,
F(2,75) = 2.72, p = 0.073, or age
group × language interaction,
F(2,75) = 1.97, p = 0.147

Retest reliability for recall time 1 to recall 3
(Cronbach’s Alpha)
α = 0.882 α = 0.946 α = 0.885

Significant effects have been further analyzed with independent-samples t-tests.