Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 19;84(3):205–213. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12373

Table 2.

Genome‐wide association studies of preterm birth

Authors Category of preterm birth Sample size Limitation Concerns
Zhang et al., 2015 <34 weeks gestation (spontaneous onset of labor)

1,851

(916 cases)

Small sample size Reduces power
Inclusion of highly heterogeneous groups (in terms of ancestry) Further reduces power
Lack of stringent control for background ancestry Increases false‐positive rate
Lack of support from markers in the same chromosomal regions Increases probability of genotyping errors
Failure of replication in independent samples Suggests unreliable results
Rapport et al. 2018

Birth between 25 and 30 weeks gestation

(spontaneous onset of labor)

13,944 (1,349 cases) split into five ancestral groups

EUR 9,890 (260 cases)

AFR 1874 (190 cases)

AMR 1847 (745 cases)

EAS 249 (131 cases)

SAS 59 (23 cases)

Each association was only observed in one of the five samples
Unable to obtain replication in any external samples Suggests unreliable results
Samples from which the associations were seen were small (AFR N preterm = 190, AMR N preterm = 745) Reduces power
Each subsample was genetically heterogeneous, controlling for ancestry challenging Further reduces power
Cases and controls were taken from different populations Possible genotyping batch effects