Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 19;182(4):869–879. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18384

Table 2.

Summary of primary and key secondary end points (ITT population; NRI)a

Hypothesis PASI 75 PASI 90 PASI 100 sPGA (0,1) responseb DLQI (0,1) response
FAEs (N = 54), n (%) 12 (22) 5 (9) 2 (4) 7 (13) [N = 53] 8 (15)
MTX (N = 54), n (%) 38 (70) 21 (39) 7 (13) 27 (52) [N = 52] 20 (37)
IXE (N = 54), n (%) 49 (91) 43 (80) 22 (41) 45 (87) [N = 52] 34 (63)
IXE vs. FAE, OR (95% CI) 34·3 (11·2–105) 38·3 (12·3–119·0) 17·9 (3·94–81·2) 42·2 (13·7–131) 9·78 (3·85–24·8)
Hochberg adjusted P‐value < 0·001 < 0·001 < 0·001 < 0·001 < 0·001
IXE vs. MTX, OR (95% CI) 4·13 (1·39–12·3) 6·14 (2·60–14·5) 4·62 (1·76–12·1) 5·95 (2·27–15·6) 2·89 (1·32–6·31)
Hochberg adjusted P‐value 0·014 < 0·001 0·0041 < 0·001 0·012
MTX vs. FAE, OR (95% CI) 8·31 (3·49–19·8) 6·24 (2·14–18·2) 3·87 (0·77–19·6) 7·10 (2·71–18·6) 3·38 (1·33–8·59)
Unadjusted P‐value < 0·001 < 0·001 0·16 < 0·001 0·015

CI, confidence interval; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; FAEs, fumaric acid esters; ITT, intention to treat; IXE, ixekizumab; MTX, methotrexate; NRI, nonresponder imputation; OR, odds ratio; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI 75, ≥ 75% improvement in PASI; sPGA, static Physician's Global Assessment. Coprimary PASI 75 comparisons for IXE vs. FAEs and IXE vs. MTX were adjusted via a primary Hochberg procedure at 24 weeks. Key secondary PASI 90, PASI 100, sPGA (0,1) and DLQI (0,1) comparisons for IXE vs. FAEs and IXE vs. MTX were adjusted by a second, separate Hochberg procedure at 24 weeks that was applied when all primary comparisons were statistically significant. aPercentages are based on the ITT population using NRI. bsPGA (0,1) response and ≥ 2‐point improvement from baseline; includes only patients with sPGA ≥ 3 at baseline.