Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 10;2016(3):MR000043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000043.pub2

EPIC 1994.

Methods RCT comparing c7E3 Fab bolus and infusion versus placebo in high‐risk patients ongoing coronary angioplasty.
Data 2099 patients were randomised (1403/696, respectively in each treatment group).
Comparisons Onsite assessment (local investigator blinded) versus assessment by an AC blinded to allocated treatment.
Outcomes The outcome selected was non fatal myocardial infarction or death from any cause. This was a prespecified composite of any of the following events in the first 30 days after randomisation.
Notes The study was identified because it was include in a review of six RCTs (Granger 2008). Data related to the number of events in each treatment group resulting from onsite‐assessor and AC assessments were extracted from this review.
Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Method for selecting cases to adjudicate? No All suspect events adjudicated were identified by onsite assessor who was blinded to allocated treatment.