Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 10;2016(3):MR000043. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000043.pub2

Hochman 2006.

Methods RCT comparing percutaneous coronary intervention plus thrombolytic therapy versus thrombolytic therapy alone in patients who had total occlusion of the infarct‐related artery 3 to 28 days after myocardial infarction.
Data 2166 patients were randomised (1082/1084, respectively in each treatment group).
Comparisons Onsite assessment (local investigator non blinded) versus assessment by an AC blinded to allocated treatment.
Outcomes The selected outcome was a composite outcome of reinfarction or heart failure or death from any cause.This was the study's primary outcome.
Notes  
Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Method for selecting cases to adjudicate? Yes All suspect events adjudicated were identified by onsite assessor who was not blinded to allocated treatment.