Table 3.
Range limit | Factor | Positive | Negative | Neutral | Biotic interactiona | Totalb |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High | Abiotic | 13 | 61 | 1 | 75 | |
Biotic | 57 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 85 | |
Low | Abiotic | 46 | 15 | 11 | 72 | |
Biotic | 49 | 12 | 4 | 9 | 74 |
This table only includes studies that evaluated both abiotic and biotic factors along range limits (n = 138).
Few studies coincidentally evaluated biotic interactions (e.g. competition, predation) at broader spatial scales.
Note that some studies documented multiple abiotic or biotic factors, which occasionally had opposite signs. For example, if a study indicated that one abiotic variable had a positive effect and another had a strong negative effect, we tallied these as separate records, which increased the total number of studies.