Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;6:57. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00599-w

Table 1.

Distribution of baseline characteristics, iOTA pilot participants

Overall
n = 20
Age category in years
 30–40 7 (35.0)
 41–50 4 (20.0)
 51–60 9 (45.0)
Gender = female 17 (85.0)
Race = White/Caucasian 10 (50.0)
Education
 High school/GED 2 (10.0)
 Some college 15 (75.0)
 College-Bachelor’s degree 3 (15.0)
Hourly pay
 $10.0–15.9 1 (5.0)
 $16.0–20.9 7 (35.0)
 $21.0–25.9 4 (20.0)
 $26.0–30.9 0 (0.0)
 $31.0+ 4 (20.0)
 Not reported 4 (20.0)
Marital status
 Never married 3 (15.0)
 Married 13 (65.0)
 Divorced/separated 2 (10.0)
 Member of an unmarried couple 2 (10.0)
BMI, kg/m2 35.6 (33.7, 40)
BMI by category
 Normal weight (BMI < 25.0) 0 (0.0)
 Overweight (BMI 25.0–29.9)a 1 (5.0)
 Obese (BMI ≥ 30) 19 (95.0)
SF-8 physical component score 48 (41, 53.4)
SF-8 mental component score 47.1 (38.3, 56.2)
Diabetes dx in past 6 months 1 (5.0)
Hypertension dx in past 6 months 10 (50.0)
Hypercholesterolemia dx in past 6 months 6 (30.0)
Have ≥ 1 conditions listed above 11 (55.0)
Have ≥ 2 conditions listed above 6 (30.0)
Usual hours worked per week 40 (40, 40)
Work non-day shifts 1 (5.0)
Coworker support scaleb 8.5 (7.8, 10.2)
Supervisor support scaleb 10.5 (8, 12)
Participated in ≥ 1 wellness program in the workplace 17 (85.0)

Presented are n (%) for categorical variables, median (25th, 75th percentile) for continuous variables

aOne participant lost weight between the self-report assessment of eligibility and the baseline weight and thus moved to overweight status (BMI = 29.2, initial, BMI based on self-reported weight = 30.4)

bRange 0–12, with higher scores indicating more support