Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0232258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232258

Table 3. Assessment of exposure in observational measurement studies.

n (N = 26) %
Biological monitoring 15 57.7
 Biological matrices investigated
  Urines 13 50.0
  Hair 1 3.8
  Blood/serum 2 7.7
  Placenta 1 3.8
  Deciduous teeth 1 3.8
 Population
  Children 11 42.3
  Pregnant women 4 15.4
  Adults 3 11.5
 Population size
  med (min–max) 192 (20–1077)
 Number of substances included
  med (min–max) 5 (0–540)
 Number of measuring campaigns
  med (min–max) 1(1–11)
Environmental monitoring 15 57.7
 Environmental matrices investigated
  House dust 14 53.8
  Outdoor air 3 11.5
  Indoor air 2 7.7
  Hand wipe 3 11.5
  Surfaces 2 7.7
  Concentrations in grass samples 1 3.8
 Population
  Children 9 34.6
  Pregnant women 3 11.5
  Adults 7 26.9
 Number of substances included
  med (min–max) 7 (2–46)
 Type of experimental sites included (n = 15)
  Schools 1 3.85
  Dwellings 15 57.7
 Number of experimental sites included
  med (min–max) 96 (2–378)
 Number of measuring campaigns
  med (min–max) 1 (1–4)
Interval including the smallest distance or perimeter around the residence considered in the spatial analysis2 (meters)
 [0–100] 15 57.7
 [100–500] 4 15.4
 [500–1000] 1 3.8
 [1000–5000] 3 11.5

1 One study investigated urinary metabolic profiles rather than pesticide residues (number of substances included = 0),

2 Three unavailable data