Table 1. Overview of common genetic approaches used in biodiversity research and their advantages and disadvantages for field-based education.
Technique | Description of technique | Applications | Advantages | Drawbacks |
---|---|---|---|---|
DNA barcoding | Amplification of a short target region of DNA that contains species diagnostic sites. | (1) Species identification, (2) biodiversity monitoring, and (3) diet and pathogen detection from scat or plants | Easy, fast, and reliable; samples can be multiplexed on a single flowcell | Requires good reference databases. |
Metabarcoding | Amplification of DNA barcodes using universal primers to detect many taxa within a bulk community or pooled taxon sample. | (1) Biodiversity monitoring, (2) microbiome analyses, and (3) diet and pathogen detection from scat or plants | Easy, fast, and reliable; samples can be multiplexed on a single flowcell | Requires good reference databases; given that analyses are usually based on individual reads, as opposed to DNA barcoding, the current read error rate might hinder correct species assignment; only one nanopore-specific pipeline available currently (WIMP). |
Metagenomics | Shotgun sequencing of total DNA in a bulk community or pooled taxon sample. | (1) Biodiversity monitoring and (2) diet and pathogen detection from scat, tissue, or plants | Easy and fast; samples can be multiplexed on a single flowcell | A current lack of good reference databases; some taxa sequence better than others, which can lead to a skewed representation; high data requirements compared to DNA barcoding or metabarcoding; given that analyses are usually based on individual reads, the current read error rate might hinder correct species assignment. |
eDNA | Metabarcoding for environmental samples to pick up trace DNA left by organisms living in the environment. | (1) Biodiversity community monitoring from environmental sources, i.e., water or soil and (2) invasive- or target-species detection in environmental samples | Easy and fast; samples can be multiplexed on a single flowcell | The current read error rate might hinder correct species assignment; no nanopore-specific pipelines available currently. |
Genome skimming | Retaining only multicopy loci, such as chloroplast or mitochondrial genomes from metagenomics data. | (1) Species identification, (2) biodiversity monitoring, and (3) diet and pathogen detection from scat or plants | Easy and fast; samples can be multiplexed on a single flowcell | The current lack of reference databases; some taxa sequence better than others, which can lead to a skewed representation; more sequencing data required compared to DNA barcoding or metabarcoding. |
Genome sequencing | Sequencing of the entire genome of an organism. | (1) Genome assembly and annotation | Requires only ONT library prep, so it is easy to execute | Requires a more-sophisticated high–molecular weight DNA isolation protocols; typically requires a high amount of sequencing coverage, more data output, and bioinformatics methods. |
Abbreviations: eDNA, environmental DNA; ONT, Oxford Nanopore Technologies; WIMP, What’s in my Pot?