Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 24;12(1):1755000. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1755000

Table 1.

Comparison of parental chicken R3bH01 to humanized & affinity optimized B30.

Name VH CDR1 VH CDR2 VH CDR3 VL CDR1 VL CDR2 VL CDR3 Apparent KD
(nM)
Kinexa KD
(pM)
pERK IC50
(nM)
R3bH01 GFDFSSYDMH GIDDGGSDTYYGSAVKG SSYDISWNGHVENIDA SGAGSGYGYG SNDKRPS GTYDSTDAGYAI 34.42 ± 5.43
(n = 3)
ND 65.60 (29.90 − 144.30%CI)
(n = 7)
B30 GFDFSSYDMH GIGDYGIETYYGSAVKG SSYDISWNGHVEHIDS SGAGSGYGYG SNDKRPS GTYVSAYYGYAI 0.12 ± 0.01
(n = 3)
1.06 pM
(3.28% error)
0.08 (0.04–0.14%CI)
(n = 20)

CDR definitions used in this manuscript are an expanded definition in comparison with the classical Kabat, including VH positions 26–29 and 49. Mutations in affinity-optimized B30 are highlighted in bold. BIAcore was used to characterize the binding kinetics for the parental antibody, R3bH01 and the affinity-optimized B30. Rate constants were calculated using a 1:1 binding model (T200 Evaluation Software) and the equilibration dissociation constant (KD) was calculated as kd/ka. KinExa was used to further refine the KD measurement for high affinity B30. The pERK assay was used to measure BDNF-TrkB neutralization in the presence of anti-BDNF antibodies. The Cellul’ERK HTRF detection kit was used to quantify downstream phospho-ERK levels and the results are expressed as pERK IC50.