Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;12(1):1755069. doi: 10.1080/19420862.2020.1755069

Table 1.

Binding and functional properties of hits derived from the full naïve campaign.

  Hit Identification Screen (FMAT)
CHO-hCCR1 vs
CHO-hCCR5
  Potency
GTPγS assay
hCCR1/hMIP-1α
   
Clone Name Specificity Rank Binding Ratio Apparent Affinity
EC50 (nM)
CHO-hCCR1
Mean IC50 (nM) IC50 range Confidence intervals (nM) Selectivity
Binding to hCCR2, 3, 5
Cross-reactivity
Rodent, minipig, and cyno CCR1
14Y029-130A06 High 103.9 153.1 Inactive >3548 NB NB
14Y029-133D02 High 103.3 7.09 23.0 17–32 NB Mini-pig
14Y029-141A10 High 79.8 9.2 64.5 35–118 NB NB
14Y029-142B03 High 75.7 57.4 156.7 102–241 NB NB
14Y029-142A07 High 70.5 180.4 827.9 314–2183 NB Mini-pig
14Y029-131H05 Medium 62.2 97.9 1240.3 209–7374 NB Mini-pig and Rat
14Y029-131C10 Medium 54.9 6.2 247.7 75–821 NB NB
14Y029-125A08 Low 33.0 16.2 1753.0 473–6503 NB NB
14Y029-131E11 Low 24.6 286.6 2952.8 2199–3966 NB Minipig
14Y029-137B01 Negative 0.88 NB 324.4 170–619 NB NB
Isotype control - - NB Inactive 1265–2412 NB NB

A small subset of hits derived from the full naïve campaign was assessed for binding to CHO-hCCR1, selectivity over related chemokine receptors, cross-reactivity to relevant preclinical orthologues, and potency in a GTPγS assay format. Specificity rank was set arbitrarily based on the CHO-hCCR1:CHO-hCCR5 binding ratio as determined using the FMAT screen: ‘High’ >70, ‘Medium’ 40–70, ‘Low’ <40, or ‘Negative’ ≤1. A total of 9 hCCR1 binders and 1 internal negative control mAb were characterized. Apparent affinity (EC50) was assessed by flow cytometry using CHO-hCCR1 cells. Selectivity and cross-reactivity were assessed by flow cytometry at a single concentration (10 µg/ml) of each mAb on suitable cell lines overexpressing paralogues or orthologues; appropriate control mAbs demonstrated expression of each chemokine receptor and binding to CHO-hCCR1 was confirmed in parallel. Potency was measured using a GTPγS assay format with signaling via CCR1 driven by MIP-1α/CCL3. EC50 and IC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism. Where Mean IC50 values are quoted, the standard lower and upper confidence intervals were also calculated from the standard error. NB – no binding observed above background.