Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr;9(2):136–151. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.09.10

Table 1. Summary of meta-analysis and systematic reviews on PVE.

Author, year Type # included studies/patients Morbidity/mortality of PVE (%) FLR increase (%) Rates of successful resection (%) Morbidity/mortality post-resection (%) Difference between ipsilateral/contralateral
transhepatic approach
Difference between the choice of embolic
Abulkhir et al., 2008 (59) Meta-analysis 37/1,088 2.2/0 8-27 (DH) 85 16/1.7 None None
Wajswol et al., 2018 (60) Meta-analysis and Systematic Review 18/607 3.1/not reported 49.4 (RH) 75.9 23.2/1.2 None None
Isofordink et al., 2017 (61) Meta-analysis and Systematic Review 17/1,953 3.9/not reported 43.2 (RH) Not reported Not reported/3.8 Not reported Not reported
van Lienden et al., 2013 (62) Meta-analysis and Systematic Review 44/1,791 2.5/0.1 37.9 (RH) 80 10.4/3.3 Not reported NBCA with greater FLR increase than gelfoam, PVA and fibrin glue

PVE, portal vein embolization; FLR, future liver remnant; DH, degree of hypertrophy; RH, relative hypertrophy; NBCA, N-butyl cyanoacrylate; PVA, polyvinyl alcohol.