Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Nov 6;11(4):557–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.10.007

Table 3.

Clinical trials of FDA-approved treatments in patients with advanced HCC.

Median
Age
(y)
(range)
Overall
Survival
Time to
Progression
Objective
Response
Rate
Median
Duration
of
Treatment
Survival
in Older
adults
First-line
Sorafenib vs Placebo76 64.9 (n/a) vs 66.3 (n/a) 10.7 mo vs 7.9 mo (HR 0.69; 95% CI: 0.55–0.87; p<0.001) 5.5 mo vs 2.8 mo (p<0.001) n/a 5.3 mo n/a
Lenvatinib vs Sorafenib70 (non-inferiority) 63 (20–88) vs 62 (22–88) [65y- <75y: 30%; 75+: 13%] 13.6 mo vs 12.3 mo (HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.79–1.06; p n/a) 8.9 mo vs 3.7 mo (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.53 –0.73; p<0.0001) 24.1 % vs 9.2% (p<0.0001) 5.7 mo mOS: 14.6 mo vs 13.4 mo (HR 0.84; 95% CI: 0.661.07)
Second-line
Regorafenib vs placebo71 (tolerated prior sorafenib > 20 days at > 400 mg/day) 64 (54–71) vs 62 (55–68) 10.6 mo vs 7.8 mo (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.500.79; p<0.0001) 3.1 mo vs 1.5 mo (HR 0.46; 95% CI: 0.37–0.56; p<0.0001 11% vs 4% (p=0.0047) 3.6 mo mOS: HR was 0.74 (95% CI: 0.490.87)
Cabozantinib vs placebo72 (2nd and 3d line) 64 (22–86) vs 64 (24–86) 10.2 vs 8 mo (HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.63–0.92; p=0.005) 5.2 mo vs 1.9 mo (HR 0.44; 95% CI: 0.36–0.52; p<0.001) 4% vs <1% (p=0.009) 3.8 mo mOS: HR 0.46 (95% CI: 0.350.59)
Ramucirumab vs placebo94 (AFP >400 ng/mL) 64 (58–73) vs 64 (56–71) 8.5 mo vs 7.3 mo (HR 0.710; 95% CI: 0.531–0.949; p=0.0199) 2.8 mo vs 1.6 mo (HR 0.452; 95% CI: 0.339–0.603; p<.0001) 5% vs 1% (p=0.1697) 12 weeks mOS: HR 0.641 (0.4290.957)
Nivolumab73 Expansion phase: 64 (56–70) [65+: 47%] Not reached; 6-mo OS rate was 83% 4.1 mo (95% CI: 3.75.5) 20% n/a n/a
Pembrolizumab vs placebo88 (18–91) vs (23–89) 13.9 mo vs 10.6 mo (HR 0.781; CI 95%: 0.6110.998; p=0.0238) 3.0 mo vs 2.8 mo (HR 0.718; CI 95%: 0.5700.904; p=0.0022) 18.3% vs 4.4% (p=0.00007) n/a n/a

Mo = months, y = years, HR = hazard ratio, CI = Confidence interval, vs = versus, n/a = not available.