Table 2.
Men | Grip strength | Gait speed | ALM | Fat mass | Hip BMD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gait speed | 0.14 | ||||
p-value | < 0.001 | ||||
ALM | 0.29 | 0.07 | |||
p-value | < 0.001 | 0.072 | |||
Fat mass | 0.09 | 0.05 | 0.45 | ||
p-value | 0.020 | 0.234 | < 0.001 | ||
Hip BMD | 0.27 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.29 | |
p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
Weight | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.73 | 0.90 | 0.41 |
p-value | < 0.001 | 0.024 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Women | |||||
Gait speed | 0.17 | ||||
p-value | < 0.001 | ||||
ALM | 0.20 | 0.08 | |||
p-value | < 0.001 | 0.024 | |||
Fat mass | 0.12 | 0.06 | 0.46 | ||
p-value | < 0.001 | 0.086 | < 0.001 | ||
Hip BMD | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.47 | |
p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | |
Weight | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.66 | 0.94 | 0.50 |
p-value | < 0.001 | 0.057 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
BMD bone mineral density, ALM appendicular lean mass
Participants with at least two conditional change measures (735 men and 863 women) were included; pairwise correlations are displayed
Change measures were derived using a residual change method and are independent of baseline level
Significant correlations (p < 0.05) are in bold; correlations where r > 0.3 are in bold and underlined