Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;106(6):616–624. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00679-2

Table 2.

Pearson correlations between conditional change measures among men and women

Men Grip strength Gait speed ALM Fat mass Hip BMD
 Gait speed 0.14
 p-value < 0.001
 ALM 0.29 0.07
 p-value < 0.001 0.072
 Fat mass 0.09 0.05 0.45
 p-value 0.020 0.234 < 0.001
 Hip BMD 0.27 0.24 0.36 0.29
 p-value < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Weight 0.19 0.09 0.73 0.90 0.41
 p-value < 0.001 0.024 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
Women
 Gait speed 0.17
 p-value < 0.001
 ALM 0.20 0.08
 p-value < 0.001 0.024
 Fat mass 0.12 0.06 0.46
 p-value < 0.001 0.086 < 0.001
 Hip BMD 0.17 0.19 0.33 0.47
 p-value < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
 Weight 0.17 0.07 0.66 0.94 0.50
 p-value < 0.001 0.057 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

BMD bone mineral density, ALM appendicular lean mass

Participants with at least two conditional change measures (735 men and 863 women) were included; pairwise correlations are displayed

Change measures were derived using a residual change method and are independent of baseline level

Significant correlations (p < 0.05) are in bold; correlations where r > 0.3 are in bold and underlined