Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 28;85(5):831–842. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04054-8

Table 3.

Population PK comparison of pola exposure (1.8 mg/kg q3w) at cycle 6 by treatment status (treatment-naïve vs. relapsed or refractory)

Pola analyte Parameter Geometric mean (% CV) GMR (90% CI)
R/R (N = 380) Treatment-naïve (N = 80)
acMMAE AUC, ng day/mL 2950 (21) 2720 (15) 0.92 (0.89–0.96)
Cmax, ng/mL 734 (15) 621 (17) 0.85 (0.82–0.88)
Unconjugated MMAE AUC, ng day/mL 20.9 (50) 15.5 (42) 0.74 (0.68–0.80)
Cmax, ng/mL 1.93 (46) 1.42 (37) 0.74 (0.68–0.80)

All treatment-naïve B-NHL patients (N = 80) were from the current Study GO29044, who received pola co-administered with CHP chemotherapy. Relapsed/refractory B-NHL patients (N = 380) were from Studies DCS4968g (NCT01290549), GO27834 (NCT01691898), and GO29365 (NCT02257567), which included patients who received either single-agent pola, pola with R/G, or pola with R/G and bendamustine

acMMAE antibody-conjugated MMAE, AUC area under the curve, B-NHL B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, CHP cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone, CI confidence interval, Cmax maximum concentration, CV coefficient of variation, G obinutuzumab, GMR geometric mean ratio, MMAE, monomethyl auristatin E, PK pharmacokinetic, pola polatuzumab vedotin, q3w every 3 weeks, R rituximab, R/R relapsed/refractory