TABLE 2.
Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
1. Gender | 1.58 | 0.494 | – | ||||||
2. Grade | 2.19 | 1.047 | 0.012 | – | |||||
3. C–C identification | 3.21 | 1.566 | 0.000 | 0.061 | – | ||||
4. FRCC | 4.47 | 1.275 | 0.146** | –0.051 | 0.339** | 0.930 | |||
5. Self-impact | 4.35 | 1.271 | –0.062 | –0.093 | 0.246** | 0.411** | 0.938 | ||
6. Promotive voice | 4.46 | 1.295 | 0.147** | −0.111* | 0.305** | 0.749** | 0.446** | 0.952 | |
7. Prohibitive voice | 4.72 | 1.219 | 0.191** | −0.106* | 0.332** | 0.653** | 0.408** | 0.785** | 0.916 |
N = 394. Internal consistency reliabilities in the diagonal. Gender, 1 = male, 2 = female. Grade, 1 = first-year students, 2 = second-year students, 3 = third-year students, and 4 = fourth-year students. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (two tailed).