Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;20:575. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08681-x

Table 2.

Self-reported health levels by 10-year age groups and various measures of physical activity levels over three surveys. The Tromsø Study 1994–2008

Hard physical activity Sedentary Some high intensity Moderate high intensity Vigorous high intensity
Age group n SRH n SRH n SRH n SRH N p-value
Tromsø 4 25–29 734 79.6% 615 87.1% 677 92.5% 444 92.3% 2470 < 0.001
30–39 2052 79.5% 1526 84.2% 1546 88.6% 712 89.9% 5836
40–49 2941 69.0% 1513 78.8% 1462 83.7% 689 85.2% 6605
50–59 2433 54.6% 817 69.6% 737 75.5% 390 74.9% 4377
60–69 2144 43.3% 373 60.3% 345 64.2% 192 62.5% 3054
70–79 1733 38.5% 145 59.3% 140 60.0% 93 65.6% 2111
≥80 559 32.9% 27 57.7% 14 28.6% 3 100.0% 603
Tromsø 5 30–39 112 81.1% 176 86.9% 161 88.2% 82 86.6% 531 < 0.001
40–49 305 73.3% 381 82.1% 381 85.5% 179 85.4% 1246
50–59 317 51.8% 275 67.5% 214 68.7% 93 73.9% 899
60–69 737 52.4% 579 66.1% 487 67.4% 219 77.4% 2022
70–79 764 42.5% 276 57.2% 249 65.4% 106 60.2% 1395
≥80 109 40.6% 33 51.6% 22 54.5% 11 66.7% 175
Tromsø 6 30–39 90 62.2% 216 75.5% 113 91.2% 24 100.0% 443 < 0.001
40–49 540 58.1% 1414 76.1% 629 87.5% 79 97.5% 2662
50–59 454 53.6% 1470 69.2% 372 81.6% 33 93.9% 2329
60–69 678 49.8% 2392 62.5% 629 79.6% 35 91.4% 3734
70–79 354 36.0% 920 57.5% 194 73.4% 4 100.0% 1472
≥80 159 30.3% 204 51.7% 34 50.0% 0 397
Light physical activity None < 1 h/week 1-2 h/week ≥3 h/week
Age group n SRH n SRH n SRH n SRH N p-value
Tromsø 4 25–29 218 79.6% 371 82.5% 826 86.7% 1057 91.0% 2472 < 0.001
30–39 492 79.7% 946 82.0% 2086 84.2% 2306 86.4% 5830
40–49 646 69.8% 1195 72.9% 2488 76.3% 2284 79.3% 6613
50–59 551 50.4% 656 59.2% 1520 63.7% 1670 66.9% 4397
60–69 439 32.6% 348 41.1% 920 49.6% 1382 55.6% 3089
70–79 501 23.4% 272 26.6% 520 44.4% 842 58.0% 2135
≥80 242 21.9% 91 35.2% 123 36.6% 149 51.4% 605
Tromsø 5 30–39 22 86.4% 60 83.1% 172 87.2% 282 86.9% 536 < 0.001
40–49 53 73.6% 179 77.0% 461 79.9% 573 82.2% 1266
50–59 63 59.0% 119 49.6% 368 62.2% 464 67.2% 1014
60–69 175 39.4% 250 53.7% 792 58.0% 1228 65.8% 2445
70–79 228 33.5% 199 36.3% 526 51.1% 720 59.1% 1673
≥80 45 27.9% 31 22.6% 58 51.8% 74 63.4% 208
Tromsø 6 30–39 0 51 54.9% 25 68.0% 27 59.3% 103 < 0.001
40–49 7 42.9% 312 60.6% 191 68.1% 295 71.5% 805
50–59 7 42.9% 304 53.2% 224 68.5% 380 62.0% 915
60–69 23 69.6% 490 52.9% 417 58.7% 864 58.5% 1794
70–79 15 26.7% 191 47.1% 205 51.5% 499 56.6% 910
≥80 6 16.7% 44 34.1% 49 35.4% 133 56.8% 232

Note: SRH is dicotomised between poor/not so good versus good/very good. Percent in the table displays those who are at good or very good Health. A chi-square test indicates that there was a significant difference in the different SRH levels and exercise level in all surveys

Tromsø 4 hard PA: LR chi2(9) = 3503.33

Tromsø 5 hard PA: LR chi2(8) = 582.58

Tromsø 6 hard PA: LR chi2(8) = 856.39

Tromsø 4 light physical activity: LR chi2(9) = 3261.85

Tromsø 4 light physical activity: LR chi2(8) = 593.20

Tromsø 4 light physical activity: LR chi2(8) = 77.69