Table 4.
Lessons learned from the formative research conducted to develop Texting for Relapse Prevention
| Focus groups |
| Text messaging behavior |
| 1. Text messaging was a mode that equalized the ability for all patients with phones to take part in the intervention. |
| 2. There was very little concern that symptoms would get in the way of texting. |
| 3. Providers thought it would be likely that phone numbers might be unstable / change frequently. |
| Program idea |
| 1. Even though the amount of text messaging that people engaged in varied, there was general agreement that 2-4 program messages a day was an acceptable number. |
| 2. Patients and providers agreed that receiving messages would feel supportive and positive. |
| 3. The proposed content (symptom queries, coping skills, medication psychoeducation) was acceptable to both patients and providers. Inspiration quotes were strongly suggested by patients. |
| 4. Providers were not concerned about how the program would affect clinic flow, but they were concerned that it might impact provider-patient communication if patients thought the program messages were being sent from them. |
| Content Advisory Teams |
| 1. Although some providers voiced concern that the messages might be too ‘corny’ or sound like a real person, the patients especially appreciated the positive tone of the messages and liked that they felt familiar (e.g., using the first-person). |
| 2. Providers worried that some of the coping skills would encourage sedentary behavior (e.g., watching TV); and that some messages seemed to promise that the coping skill would work for everyone. Both issues needed to be addressed in the messages. |
| 3. Longer messages needed to be shortened for readability. |
| 4. Content needed to acknowledge that not everyone has friends/family available and to provide other ideas (e.g., community centers). |
| 5. Messages also needed to acknowledge that not everyone is mobile and able to do exercise beyond what they can do in a chair. |