Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;20:356. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06826-0

Table 4.

Treatment patterns among patients with metastatic NSCLC with a subsequent therapy

Subsequent therapy Patients who received 1 L EGFR-TKI and had subsequent therapy Patients who received 2 L+ EGFR-TKI and had subsequent therapy
(N = 160) (N = 134)
Chemotherapy alone, n (%) 25 (15.6) 29 (21.6)
Immunotherapy alone, n (%) 22 (13.8) 55 (41.0)
Targeted therapies n (%)a 112 (70.0) 49 (36.6)
EGFR-TKIb 102 (63.8) 33 (24.6)
Continued on/switched to another 1st/2nd gen. EGFR-TKI 62 (38.8) 27 (20.1)
Afatinib 33 (20.6) 11 (8.2)
Erlotinib 17 (10.6) 13 (9.7)
Gefitinib 13 (8.1) 5 (3.7)
Osimertinibc 40 (25.0) 7 (5.2)
Other targeted therapiesd 10 (6.3) 16 (11.9)
Clinical study drug, n (%) 1 (0.6) 1 (0.7)

1 L first line, 2 L+ second or later line, ALK anaplastic lymphoma kinase EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR-TKI epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, NSCLC non-small cell lung cancer

a Patients could have received targeted therapies alone or in combination with chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy

b Four patients had more than one EGFR-TKI as a subsequent therapy. Hence, the sum of the individual EGFR-TKIs (i.e. afatinib, erlotinib, geftinib, and osimertinib) will be greater than the total number who received EGFR-TKI

c Of the 47 patients who received osimertinib as subsequent therapies, 24 were tested T790M positive, seven were not positive for T790M, and 16 were not tested for EGFR mutations

d Other targeted therapeutic agents are listed in Table 1