Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 28;20:251. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02929-5

Table 2.

Sub-analysis of studies on antenatal depression conducted in Africa (N = 27, random effect)

Variable for sub-analysis Number of studies Sample size (N) Pooled prevalence (95%CI) random effect model
The income of the countries
 Low-income 12 7115 26.54(22.23, 30.85)
 Middle-income 15 7775 26.13 (19.60, 32.64)
Time of depression measurement
 1st trimester 1 2086 9.90 (8.60, 11.20)
 2nd trimester 5 3803 32.20 (26.13, 38.28)
 3rd trimester 8 4312 25.39 (20.15, 30.65)
 All trimester 13 4689 25.71 (19.30, 32.11)
Study setting
 Community-based 8 7891 25.11 (16.52, 33.69)
 Health institution based 19 6999 26.77 (22.54, 30.99)
Study design
 Longitudinal 7 5353 28.49 (18.47, 38.52)
 Cross sectional 20 9537 25.50 (21.16, 29.84)
Sample size
  < =384 8 1626 23.59 (15.49, 31.69)
  > 384 19 14,757 27.43 (22.54, 32.31)
Year of Publication
 2007–2009 2 375 9.46 (6.46, 12.46)
 2010–2012 4 2118 39.44 (37.37, 41.50)
 2013–2015 11 7525 22.75 (17.32, 28.18)
 2016–2018 10 6740 27.92 (22.41, 33.43)
Type of screening tool used
 EPDS 11 6898 28.89 (22.79, 34.98)
 PHQ-9 5 4578 28.54 (27.23, 29.84)
 Diagnostic tools (DSM-IV,CIS-R) 3 665 25.22 (8.33, 42.11)
 Other (CES-D, SRQ, HSC, BDI) 8 4617 21.96 (14.30, 29.62)